Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of body size within and between wild populations of Drosophila buzzatii

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four populations of the cactophilous species D. buzzatii have been compared with respect to the phenotypic variation of thorax and wing length of wild versus laboratory reared flies. Three of the strains were intercrossed to provide parent, F1 and F2 comparisons as a test of co-adaptation. The genetic contribution to phenotypic variation of laboratory reared flies was estimated from the correlation between sibs derived from random pair mating and reared individually in separate cultures. The average natural temperature during development was estimated from the relations between the wing/thorax ratio and temperature in laboratory tests.

The variance of thorax and wing length of wild flies was several times greater than that of laboratory reared flies and the increase was attributed primarily to variation in larval food supply although temperature fluctuation is also important. There was no evidence of heterosis or F2 break-down in the crosses. For two of the populations the heritability of thorax length was high, 60–70%, and substantially lower for the third. The average temperature estimated from the wing/thorax/temperature relationship differed between sites. The reduction of body size below the potential maximum averaged 30% for two and 20% for the other population, with a wide spread about these values. The evidence is discussed in relation to assessing the nature of ecological variation by comparing the variation of morphological traits in wild and laboratory reared flies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J. S. F. & East, P. D., 1980. Evidence for selection following perturbation of allozyme frequencles in a natural population of Drosophila. Nature 284: 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. S. F. & Mulley, J. C., 1976. Isozyme variation in natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 30(2): 212–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. R., 1979. Utilization of morphological traits for the analysis of genetic variation in wild populations. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 20: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarquhar, A. M. & Robertson, F. W., 1963. The lack of evidence for co-adaptation in crosses between geographical races of Drosophila subobscura Coll. Genet. Res. 4: 104–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masry, A. M. & Robertson, F. W., 1978. Cell size and number in the Drosophila wing. III. The influence of temperature differences during development. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 8(1): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R. K. & Reeve, E. C. R., 1964. Clines in body dimension in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genet. Res. 5: 240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulley, J. C., James, J. W. & Barker, J. S. F., 1979. Allozyme genotype-environment relationships in natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Biochem. Genet. 17: 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfriem, P., 1983. Latitudinal variation in wing size in Drosophila subobscura and its dependence on polygenes in chromosome O. Genetica 61: 221–232. between inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. indukt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti, A., 1955. Geographical variability in quantitative traits in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. quant. Biol. XX: 294–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., 1957. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 55: 428–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., 1959. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XII. Cell size and number in relation to genetic and anvironmental variation in body size in Drosophila. Genetics (44) 2: 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., 1962. Changing the relative size of the body parts of Drosophila by selection. Genet. Res. 3: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size — in relation to larval diet. Genet. Res. 4: 74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. & Reeve, E. C. R., 1952. Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection on wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 50: 414–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. & Reeve, E. C. R., 1955. Studies in quantitative inheritance. VIII. Further analyses of heterosis in crosses between inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. indukt. Abstamm. VererbLehre. 86: 439–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., Shook, M., Takei, G. & Gaines, H., 1968. Observations on the growth and nutrition of Drosophila disticha — an indigenous Hawalian species. Univ. of Texas Publ. Studies in Genetics, No. 4: 280–299.

  • Sokoloff, A., 1957. Discussion, comments; Cold Spring Harbor Symp. quant. Biol. 22: 268–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetukhiv, M., 1954. Integration of the genotype in local populations of Drosophila pseudo-obscura, Evolution 10: 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, F.W. Variation of body size within and between wild populations of Drosophila buzzatii . Genetica 72, 111–125 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123169

Keywords

Navigation