Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 3, Issue 2–3, pp 261–286 | Cite as

When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax

  • Lawrence H. Summers
  • Victoria P. Summers


Unlike most major industrialized nations, the United States does not impose an excise tax on securities transactions. This article examines the desirability and feasibility of implementating a U.S. Securities Transfer Excise Tax (STET) directed at curbing excesses associated with short-term speculation and at raising revenue. We conclude that strong economic efficiency arguments can be made in support of a STET that throws “sand into the gears,” in James Tobin's (1982) phrase, of our excessively well-functioning financial markets. Such a tax would have the beneficial effects of curbing instability introduced by speculation, reducing the diversion of resources into the financial sector of the economy, and lengthening the horizons of corporate managers. The efficiency benefits derived from curbing speculation are likely to exceed any costs of reduced liquidity or increased costs of capital that come from taxing financial transactions more heavily. The examples of Japan and the United Kingdom suggest that a STET is administratively feasible and can be implemented without crippling the competitiveness of U.S. financial markets. A STET at a .5% rate could raise revenues of at least $10 billion annually.


Beneficial Effect Financial Market Financial Sector Economic Efficiency Corporate Manager 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. A Guide to Japanese Taxes, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Black, Fischer, “Noise.” Journal of Finance (1986), 529–543.Google Scholar
  3. Butterworth's UK Tax Guide 1987–88, 6th ed. London, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Cutler, David M., Poterba, James M. and Summers, Lawrence H. “What Moves Stock Prices?” Journal of Portfolio Management (1989, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  5. DeLong, J. Bradford, Shleifer, Andrei, Summers, Lawrence H. and Waldmann, Robert J. “The Economic Consequences of Noise Traders.” Harvard mimeo, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. Fama, Eugene and French, Kenneth. “Permanent and Transitory Components of Stock Prices.” Journal of Political Economy (1988), 246–273.Google Scholar
  7. French, Kenneth and Roll, Richard. “Stock Return Variances: The Arrival of Information and the Reaction of Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics (1987), 5–26.Google Scholar
  8. JensenMichael C. “Symposium on Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 6 (June/September 1978), 95–101.Google Scholar
  9. Joint Committee on Taxation. “Staff Memorandum on the Imposition of Security Transaction Taxes.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. KeynesJohn Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1936.Google Scholar
  11. Kyle, Pete. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica (1985), 1315–1336.Google Scholar
  12. New York Stock Exchange. Fact Book. 1988.Google Scholar
  13. Roll, Richard. “Orange Juice and Weather.” American Economic Review (1984), 861–880.Google Scholar
  14. Roll, Richard. “R-Squared.” Journal of Finance (1988).Google Scholar
  15. Poterba, James M. and Summers, Lawrence H. “Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Financial Economics (1988).Google Scholar
  16. Scott, Thomas and Mehta, Nik. “The U.K.'s New Tax on Securities.” International Financial Law Review(December 1986).Google Scholar
  17. Shiller, Robert. “Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Dividends?” American Economic Review (1981), 421–436.Google Scholar
  18. . “Stock Prices and Social Dynamics.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1984), 457–498.Google Scholar
  19. Summers, Lawrence H. “Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?” Journal of Finance(1986), 591–601.Google Scholar
  20. Tobin, James. “On the Efficiency of the Financial System.” Lloyds Bank Review (July 1984).Google Scholar
  21. Tobin, James. “A Proposal for International Monetary Reform.” Eastern Economic Review (1978), 153–159.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence H. Summers
    • 1
  • Victoria P. Summers
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.International Tax ProgramHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations