Abstract
Various investigations of prophase of the first meiotic division of female mice showed different results with respect to the appearance of those stages during ovarian development. It was not clear up to now whether in oocytes, in addition to the dictyotene stage, there exists a diffuse diplotene stage as can be found during male meiosis.
In this study the morphology of meiotic prophase stages was compared in preparations of oocytes with and without hypotonic pretreatment. There appears to be a strong effect of hypotonic treatment on the morphology of different meiotic prophase stages and there is a striking resemblance with meiotic stages from male material which was treated similarly. From the results of hypotonically untreated ovarian material it was obvious that early desynaptic stages could be confused with pachytene.
In addition, it was demonstrated that there exists a diffuse (diplotene) stage with a duration of approximately 3 days before dictyotene stage. The possible function of the diffuse stage is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakken, A. H. & McClanahan, M., 1978. Patterns of RNA synthesis in early meiotic prophase oocytes from fetal mouse ovaries. Chromosoma 67: 21–40.
Borum, K. 1961. Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase. Exp. Cell Res. 24: 495–507.
Cardoso, H., Peceli, A., Dutra, A. & Mazzella, M. C., 1984. The timing and RNA transcription of the diffuse stage of meiotic prophase in the male cricket. Chromosoma 90: 349–354.
Comings, D. E. & Okada, T. A. 1972. Architecture of meiotic cells and mechanisms of chromosome pairing. In: Advances in cell and molecular biology. Vol. 2. Ed. E. J.DuPraw. Academic Press, New York & London.
Dietrich, A. J. J., 1986. The influence of hypotonic treatment on the morphology of meiotic stages. I. Prophase of the first meiotic division of male mice, man and Locusta migratoria. Genetica 69: 19–26.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & deBoer, P., 1983. A sequential analysis of the development of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of the mouse by electron microscopy using hydroxyures and agarfiltration. Genetica 61: 119–129.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & Mulder, R. J. P., 1981. A light microscopic study of the development and behaviour of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of the mouse. Chromosoma 83: 409–418.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & Mulder, R. J. P. 1983. A light-and electron microscopic analysis of meiotic prophase in female mice. Chromosoma 88: 377–385.
Dietrich, A. J. J., Mulder, R. J. P. & Tates, A. D., 1983. The behaviour and structure of the sex chromosome in spermatocytes of Microtus oeconomus. Genetica 61: 113–117.
Evans, C. W., Robb, D. I., Tuckett, F. & Challoner, S., 1982. Regulation of meiosis in the foetal mouse gonad. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 68: 59–67.
Hartung, M. & Stahl, A. 1977. Preleptotene chromosome condensation in mouse oogenesis. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 18: 309–319.
Jagiello, G. & Fang, J. S., 1979. Analysis of diplotene chiasma frequency and maternal age in mammals. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 23: 53–60.
Oud, J. L., deJong, J. J. & deRooij, D. G. 1979. A sequential analysis of meiosis in the male mouse using a restricted spermatocyte population obtained by a hydroxyurea/triaziquone treatment. Chromosoma 71: 237–248.
Speed, R. M., 1982. Meiosis in foetal mouse ovary. I. An analysis at the light microscopic level using surface-spreading. Chromosoma 85: 427–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dietrich, A.J.J. The influence of hypotonic treatment on the morphology of meiotic stages II. Prophase of the first meiotic division of female mice up to dictyotene. Genetica 70, 161–165 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122182
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122182