Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of drilling parameters on bone

Part II The influence of drilling site

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

For orthopaedic biomaterial implantation testing, specimens are often implanted into cortical bone defects. The implantation site is assumed to be one of the factors that influence the bone response to biomaterials. The aim of this study was to investigate the bone-healing process in drilled cortical defects at different sites with respect to time. Sheep metatarsus was implemented, since it is a long straight bone with four flat faces. Thus, the different drilling sites were obtained by changing the longitudinal level (proximal, middle and distal) and bone aspect (anterior, lateral and posterior). Metatarsi were obtained at 1, 2, 3 and 4 months post-operatively and with non-decalcified sections the newly formed bone area was measured using a microscope connected to an image analyser. The rate of bone formation was higher in the anterior aspect (P<0.05). The new bone did not form concentrically from the hole edge towards the centre, and the principal direction of bone growth was different between the anterior and the posterior aspects (P<0.05). However, there was no difference with respect to the longitudinal axis. These results indicate that the implantation site must be considered when analysing the bone response to biomaterials implanted in cortical defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. SEVITT, in “Bone Repair and Fracture Healing in Man” (Churchill Livingstone, London, 1981) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. CARTER, P. R. BLENMAN and G. S. BEAUPRE, J. Orthop. Res. 6 (1988) 736.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. SHAPIRO, J. Bone Joint Surg. 70A (1988) 1067.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U. PALME, Thesis, University of Ulm (1984).

  5. S. SEVITT, in “Bone Repair and Fracture Healing in Man” (Churchill Livingstone, London, 1981) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. BERGMANN, Thesis, University of Berlin (1981).

  7. L. CLAES, in “Experimentelle und Theoretische Untersuchungen zur Biomechanik der Osteosynthese” (Habil., University of Ulm, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. CLAES, U. PALME, E. PALME and U. KIRSCHBAUM, in “Biomechanics: Principles and Applications” (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1982) p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohashi, H., Therin, M., Meunier, A. et al. The effect of drilling parameters on bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 5, 232–236 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121094

Keywords

Navigation