Vegetatio

, Volume 43, Issue 1–2, pp 5–21 | Cite as

The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances

  • I. R. Noble
  • R. O. Slatyer
Article

Summary

A comprehensive scheme is presented which provides qualitative models of vegetation dynamics in communities subject to recurrent disturbance. The scheme has been derived to deal mainly with terrestrial communities dominated by higher plants, but may be more widely applicable.

The scheme utilizes a small number of life history attributes termed ‘vital attributes’ which pertain to the potentially dominant species in a particular community. Three main groups of vital attributes are recognized, relating to the method of persistence of species during a disturbance and to their subsequent arrival, to their ability to establish and grow to maturity following the disturbance, and to the time taken for them to reach critical stages in their life history.

In the application of the scheme, each major species is first categorized into a ‘species type’, determined by its specific attributes in the first two vital attribute groups. The interaction between various species, based on their species types and life stage attributes, then yields a replacement sequence which depicts the major shifts in composition and dominance which occur following a disturbance. Although 30 species types are recognized, only 15 distinct patterns of behaviour are displayed in replacement sequences.

Examples of replacement sequences for two different forest communities are provided.

The degree to which vital attributes are robust properties of a species is explored in relation to different disturbance frequencies and intensities, and to the seasonal time of disturbance.

Keywords

Disturbance Dynamics Fire Models Succession Vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashton, D.H. 1956. Studies on the autecology of Encalyptus regnans F.v. M. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Molbourne, unpublished.Google Scholar
  2. Cattelino, P.J., I.R.Noble, R.O.Slatyer & S.R.Kessell. 1979. Predicting the multiple pathways of plant succession. Environ. Manage. 3: 41–50.Google Scholar
  3. Clements, F.E. 1916. Plant succession. Carnegie Inst. Washington, Publ. 242, 512 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Clements, F.E. 1936 Nature and structure of the climax. J. Ecol., 24: 252–284.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J.H. & R.O.Slatyer. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Amer. Nat. 111: 1119–1144.Google Scholar
  6. Drury, W.H. & I.C.T.Nisbet. 1973. Succession. J. Arnold Arboretum 54: 331–368.Google Scholar
  7. Egler, F.E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts, I. Initial floristic composition—a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4: 412–417.Google Scholar
  8. Forcier, L.K. 1975. Reproductive strategies and the co-occurrence of climax tree species. Science 189: 808–809.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J.M. 1959. Forest succession in the Florentine Valley, Tasmania. Pap. Roy. Soc. Tas. 93: 129–151.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, A.M. 1975. Fire and the Australian flora: A review. Aust. For. 38: 4–25.Google Scholar
  11. Gleason, H.A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53, 7–26.Google Scholar
  12. Golley, F.B. (ed.) 1977. Benchmark Papers in Ecology 15. Ecological Succession. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Pennsylvania. 375 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Harper, I.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London. 892 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Horn, H.S. 1976. Succession, In: R.M.May (ed.), Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. p. 187–204. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, T.M. 1973. Studies on the ecology of Nothofagus cunninghamij Gerst., 1. Natural regeneration on the Mt. Donna Buang massif, Victoria. Aust. J. Bot. 21: 67–78.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, W.D. 1968. Fire, air, water and earth—an elemental ecology of Tasmania. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 3: 9–16.Google Scholar
  17. Jarrett, P.H. & A.H.K.Petrie. 1929. The vegetation of Black's Spur region, II. Pyric succession. J. Ecol. 17: 249–281.Google Scholar
  18. Kessell, S.R. 1979. Gradient Modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York. 320 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Lyon, L.J. & P.F.Stickney. 1977. Early vegetational succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. Proc. Tall Timbers Fire Ecol. Conf. 14: 355–375.Google Scholar
  20. Naveh, Z. 1975. The evolutionary significance of fire in the Mediterranean region. Vegetatio 29: 199–208.Google Scholar
  21. Noble, I.R. & R.O. Slatyer. 1977. Post fire succession of plants in Mediterranean ecosystems. In: H.A. Mooney & C.E. Conrad (eds.), Proc. Symp. Environmental Consequences of Fire and Fual Management in Mediterranean Ecosystems, pp. 27–36. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-3.Google Scholar
  22. Noble, I.R. & R.O.Slatyer, 1978. The effect of disturbances on plant succession. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 10: 135–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. R. Noble
    • 1
  • R. O. Slatyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental BiologyResearch School of Biological SciencesCanberra CityAustralia

Personalised recommendations