Skip to main content
Log in

Combination antiarrhythmic treatment among class Ia, Ib, and II agents for ventricular arrhythmias

  • Current Topic in Anatiarrhythmic Treatment—Combined Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ventricular arrhythmia suppression trials were performed to compare the efficacies and side effects of disopyramide and mexiletine used alone and in combination, and to compare the efficacies and side effects of mexiletine and propranolol used alone and in combination, in patients with chronic ventricular premature contractions (VPCs, ≥3000 beats/day). The study on the combination of disopyramide and mexiletine included 26 patients (19 men and 7 women). Disopyramide 100 mg tid or mexiletine 150 mg tid was administered as single-drug therapy, and disopyramide 50 mg plus mexiletine 100 mg tid was administered as combination therapy. Each patient underwent Holter monitoring during four different periods: baseline, disopyramide alone, mexiletine alone, and combination therapy. The mean number of VPCs/hr at baseline was 796±522 (mean±SD), which was significantly decreased with all three therapies (p<0.01 in each) to a) 415±480 with disopyramide alone, b) 341±368 with mexiletine alone, and c) 345±408 with the combination therapy. The number of patients demonstrating a significant reduction in VPCs (≥75%) and the elimination of ventricular tachycardia (VT; three or more consecutive VPCs) did not differ significantly among the three therapies. The prematurity index (PI), vulnerability index (VI), and QTc tended to be aggravated by disopyramide therapy alone, but these values were corrected by combination therapy. No patients withdrew from the study due to side effects during combination therapy, although three patients withdrew from the study due to severe side effects during single-drug therapy. The study on the combination of mexiletine and propranolol included 19 patients (8 men and 11 women) with chronic VPCs. Mexiletine 150 mg tid or propranolol 20 mg tid was administered as single-drug therapy, and mexiletine 100 mg plus propranolol 10 mg tid was administered as combination therapy. Each patient underwent Holter monitoring during four different periods: baseline, mexiletine alone, propranolol alone, and combination therapy. The mean number of VPCs/hr was 677±572, at baseline, which was significantly reduced to a) 345±500 with mexiletine alone, b) 457±544 with propranolol alone, and c) 342±513 with combination therapy (p< 0.01 in each). The number of patients showing a significant reduction (≥75%) and the elimination of VTs did not differ among the three therapies. No patients withdrew from the study due to side effects during combination therapy, although two patients withdrew due to severe side effects during single-drug therapy. This study suggests that combination therapy with small doses of antiarrhythmic drugs is not likely to change the prematurity index, vulnerability index, or QTC. Further studies are required before these data can be extrapolated to higher doses of drugs and to patients with serious arrhythmias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaughan Williams, EM. Classification of anti-arrhythmic drugs. In: Sandøe, E, Flenstedt Jensen, E, Olesen, KH, eds. Symposium of cardiac arrhythmias. Södertälje, Sweden: Astra Publishing, 1970:449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, BN, Hauswirth, O. Comparative mechanisms of action of antiarrhythmic drugs. Am Heart J 1974;87:367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koch-Weser, J. Disopyramide. N Engl J Med 1979;300: 957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teichman, SL. The anticholinergic side effects of Norpace and Norpace CR. Angiology 1985;36:767–771.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tablot, RC, Julian, DG, Prescott, LF. Long-term treatment of ventricular arrhythmias with oral mexiletine. Am Heart J 1976;91:58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duff, HJ, Roden, D, Primm, RK, et al. Mexiletine in the treatment of resistant ventricular arrhythmias: Enhancement of efficacy and reduction of dose-related side effects by combination with quinidine. Circulation 1983;67:1124–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olsson, G, Rehnqvist, N. Ventricular arrhythmia during the first year after acute myocardial infarction: Influence of long term treatment with propranolol. Circulation 1984;69: 1129–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frishman, W, Furberg, CD, Friedewald, WT. Beta-adrenergic blockade for survivors of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1984;310:830–837.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, J, Goel, BG. Electrophysiologic precursors of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Arch Intern Med 1972;129:749–755.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, SG, Mercando, AD, Tam, S, et al. Combination of disopyramide and mexiletine for better tolerance and additive effects for treatment of ventricular arrhythmia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:659–664.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohashi, K, Ebihara, A, Hashimoto, T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and the antiarrhythmic effect of mexiletine in patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias. Arzneim.-Forsch/Drug Res 1984;34:503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kasanuki, H, Onishi, S, Hirosawa, K. The usefulness of electrophysiological-pharmacologic studies in the long-term therapy of paroxysmal tachycardias. Jpn Circ J 1985;49: 351–361.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanabe, T, Yoshikawa, H, Tagawa, R, et al. Evaluation of antiarrhythmic efficacy using Holter electrocardiographic technique. Jpn Circ J 1985;49:337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kjekshus, K, Bethen, J, Orning, OM, et al. A double blind, crossover comparison of flecainide acetate and disopyramide phosphate in the treatment of ventricular premature complexes. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:72B-78B.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tanabe, T, Yoshikawa, H. Furuya, H, et al. Therapeutic effectiveness of plasma levels of single or combination use of class I antiarrhythmic agents for ventricular arrhythmias. Jpn Circ J 1988;52:298–305.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, NPJ, Pantridge, JF, Adgey, AAJ. Long-term oral antiarrhymic therapy with mexiletine. Br Heart J 1978; 40:796–801.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta, J, Conti, CR. Mexiletine, a new antiarrhythmic agent, for treatment of premature ventricular complexes. Am J Cardiol 1982;49:455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fors, WJJr, Vanderark, CR, Reynolds, EW. Evaluation of propranolol and quinidine in the treatment of quinidineresistant arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1971;27:190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deedwania, PC, Olukotun, AY, Kupersmith, J, et al. Beta blockers in combination with class I antiarrhythmic agents. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:21D-26D.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leahey, EB, Heissenbuttel, RH, Giardina, EGV, et al. Combined mexiletine and propranolol treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia. Br Med J 1980;281:357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Capucci, A, Frabetti, L, Gubelli, S, et al. Tocainide and metoprolol: An efficacious therapeutic combination in the treatment of premature ventricular beats. Clin Cardiol 1989; 12:322–331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanabe, T. Combination antiarrhythmic treatment among class Ia, Ib, and II agents for ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 5 (Suppl 4), 827–834 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120831

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120831

Key Words

Navigation