Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of combined use of class I antiarrhythmic agents on V max of guinea-pig ventricular muscles

  • Current Topic in Anatiarrhythmic Treatment—Combined Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of the combined use of class-I antiarrhythmic drugs on the resting potentials (RP), amplitude of action potential (AMP), and V max of the action potential were investigated in guinea-pig ventricular papillary muscles that were superfused with oxygenated Krebs-Ringer solution at 35°C. Disopyramide (40 μM) reduced V max to 68.6 ± 3.1% (mean ± SE, n=5) of the control with minimal changes in RP and AMP when preparations were stimulated at 1 Hz. The addition of mexiletine (20 μM) to the solution containing disopyramide (40 μM) caused a minimal reduction of V max (less than 5%) for the stimulation of 1 Hz, but a significant reduction of V max (13% p<0.05) when stimulation was increased to 2 Hz. This amount of the reduction is compatible with that obtained by mexiletine alone, suggesting a simple additive Na+ channel inhibition by this drug combination. This additive effect was also observed in the recovery process of V max from the use-dependent block induced by train stimuli at 1 Hz. Flecainide (5 μM) reduced V max to 58.6±13.3% (n=5). The addition of mexiletine to the superfusate with flecainide produced a further depression of 14±2.6% of V max , even at 1 Hz. This depression was larger than that produced by mexiletine, suggesting a synergistic action of the two drugs on the Na+ channel. Such information about the interaction of the class I drug combinations with the Na+ channel may be clinically important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levy, S. Combination therapy for cardiac arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:95A-101A.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greenspan, AM, Spielman, SR, Horowitz, LN. Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. PACE 1986;9:565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duff, HJ, Mitchell, LB, Manyari, D, et al. Mexiletinequinidine combination: Electrophysiologic correlation of a favorable antiarrhythmic interaction in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:1149–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duff, HJ, Kolodgic, FD, Roden, DM, et al. Electropharmacologic synergism with mexiletine and quinidine. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8:840–846.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenspan, AM, Spielman, SR, Webb, CR, et al. Efficacy of combination therapy with mexiletine and a type IA agent for inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breithhardt, G, Seipel, L, Abendroth, RR. Comparison of the antiarrhythmic efficacy of disopyramide and mexiletine against stimulus-induced ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1981;3:1026–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hille, B. Local anesthetics: Hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for the drug-receptor reactions. J Gen Physiol 1977;69:497–515.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hondeghem, LM, Katzung, BG. Time- and voltagedependent interaction of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channels. Biochim Biophys Acta 1977;472:373–398.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bean, BP, Cohen, CJ, Tsien, RW. Block of cardiac sodium channels by tetrodotoxin and lidocaine: Sodium current and (V max ) experiments. In: APaes de Carvalho, ed. Normal and abnormal conduction in the heart. Mount Kisko, NY: Futura, 1982:189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Toyama, J, Kodama, I, Kusunoki, T, et al. Use-dependent blicking action of newly developed lidocaine-analogs on maximum rate of rise of action potentials in guinea pig papillary muscle. Jpn Heart J 1987;28:273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell, TJ. Resting and rate-dependent depression of maximum rate of depolarization (V max ) in guinea pig ventricular action potentials by mexiletine, disopyramide, and encainide. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1983;5:291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell, TJ. Kinetics of onset of rate-dependent effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs are important in determining their effects on refractoriness in guinea-pig ventricle, and provide a theoretical basis for their subclassification. Cardiovasc Res 1983;17:344–352.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hondeghem, LM, Matsubara, T. Quinidine blocks cardiac sodium channels during opening and slow inactivation in guinea pig papillary muscle. Br J Pharmacol 1988;93: 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kodama, I. Toyama, J, Takanaka, C, et al. Block of activated and inactivated sodium channels by class-I antiarrhythmic drugs studied by using the maximum upstroke velocity (Vmax) of action potential in guinea-pig cardiac muscles. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1987;19:367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sheets, MF, Hanck, DA, Fozzard, HA. Nonlinear relation between Vmax and INa in canine cardiac Purkinje cells. Circ Res 1988;63:386–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toyama, J., Kawamura, T. & Kodama, I. Effects of combined use of class I antiarrhythmic agents on V max of guinea-pig ventricular muscles . Cardiovasc Drug Ther 5 (Suppl 4), 801–804 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120828

Key Words

Navigation