Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 261–274 | Cite as

Applied model for the growth of the daytime mixed layer

  • Ekaterina Batchvarova
  • Sven-Erik Gryning


A slab model is proposed for developing the height of the mixed layer capped by stable air aloft. The model equations are closed by relating the consumption of energy (potential and kinetic) at the top of the mixed layer to the production of convective and mechanical turbulent kinetic energy within the mixed layer. By assuming that the temperature difference at the top of the mixed layer instantaneously adjusts to the actual meteorological conditions without regard to the initial temperature difference that prevailed, the model is reduced to a single differential equation which easily can be solved numerically. When the mixed layer is shallow or the atmosphere nearly neutrally stratified, the growth is controlled mainly by mechanical turbulence. When the layer is deep, its growth is controlled mainly by convective turbulence. The model is applied on a data set of the evolution of the height of the mixed layer in the morning hours, when both mechanical and convective turbulence contribute to the growth process. Realistic mixed-layer developments are obtained.


Atmosphere Differential Equation Kinetic Energy Temperature Difference Model Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carson, D. J.: 1973, ‘The Development of a Dry Inversion-Capped Convectively Unstable Layer’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 450–467.Google Scholar
  2. Carson, D. J. and Smith, F. B.: 1974, ‘Thermodynamic Model for the Development of a Convectively Unstable Boundary Layer’, Advances Geophys. 18A, Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
  3. Driedonks, A. G. M.: 1982, ‘Models and Observations of the Growth of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 23, 283–306.Google Scholar
  4. Dyer, A. J.: 1974, ‘A Review of Flux Profile Relationships’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 363–372.Google Scholar
  5. Gryning, S. E. and Batchvarova, E.: 1990a, ‘Simple Model of the Daytime Boundary Layer Height’, Ninth Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion. American Meteorological Society. April 30–May 3, 1990. Roskilde, Denmark, pp. 379–382.Google Scholar
  6. Gryning, S. E. and Batchvarova, E.: 1990b, ‘Analytical Model for the Growth of the Coastal Internal Boundary Layer During Onshore Flow’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 116, 187–203.Google Scholar
  7. Holtslag, A. A. M. and van Ulden, A. P.: 1983, ‘A Simple Scheme for Daytime Estimates of the Surface Fluxes from Routine Weather Data’, J. Climate Appl. Meteorol. 22, 517–529.Google Scholar
  8. Högström, U.: 1988, ‘Non-Dimensional Wind and Temperature Profiles in the Atmospheric Surface Layer: A Re-evaluation’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 42, 55–78.Google Scholar
  9. Kantha, L. H., Phillips, O. M., and Azad, R. S.: 1977, ‘On Turbulent Entrainment at a Stable Density Interface’, J. Fluid Mech. 79, 753–768.Google Scholar
  10. Kato, H. and Phillips, O. M.: 1969, ‘On the Penetration of a Turbulent Layer into Stratified Fluid’, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 643–655.Google Scholar
  11. Lilly, D. K.: 1968, ‘Models of Cloud-Topped Mixed Layers Under a Strong Inversion’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 292–309.Google Scholar
  12. Mahrt, L. and Lenschow, D. H.: 1976, ‘Growth Dynamics of the Convectively Mixed Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 41–51.Google Scholar
  13. Manins, P. C.: 1982, ‘The Daytime Planetary Boundary Layer: A New Interpretation of the Wangara Data’;. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 108, 689–705.Google Scholar
  14. Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: 1984, Atmospheric Turbulence, John Wiley and Sons, p. 397Google Scholar
  15. Stull, R. B.: 1976, ‘The Energetics of Entrainment Across a Density Interface’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1260–1267.Google Scholar
  16. Tennekes, H.: 1973, ‘A Slab Model for the Dynamics of the Inversion Above a Convective Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 30, 558–567.Google Scholar
  17. Tennekes, H. and Driedonks, A. G. M.: 1981, ‘Basic Entrainment Equations for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 20, 515–531.Google Scholar
  18. Tennekes, H. and van Ulden, A. P.: 1974, ‘Short-Term Forecasts of Temperature and Mixing Height on Sunny Days’, Symposium on Atmospheric Diffusion and Air Pollution. American Meteorological Society, September 9–13, Santa Barbara, California, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
  19. Zeman, O. and Tennekes, H.: 1977, ‘Parameterization of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budget at the Top of the Daytime Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 111–123.Google Scholar
  20. Zeuner, G. and Heinemann, K. (eds.): 1990, ‘Investigations on Atmospheric Dispersion of Air Pollutants after Short-Time Releases in Complex Terrain. Third Field Experiment on Atmospheric Dispersion around the Isolated Hill Sophienhöhe in August/September 1988’. Report-Jül-2388. ISSN 0336-0885. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, p 273.Google Scholar
  21. Zilitinkevich, S. S.: 1975, ‘Comments on a Paper by H. Tennekes’, J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 991–992.Google Scholar
  22. Zilitinkevich, S. S.: 1991, Turbulent Penetrative Convection, Published by Gower Press (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekaterina Batchvarova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sven-Erik Gryning
    • 1
  1. 1.Risø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Bulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations