Skip to main content
Log in

Application of behavioral technology to small group discussion with university students

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tokens were given to university students in two separate experiments for participation in small group discussions. In the first experiment a multiple baseline design was used with two small groups in an educational psychology class. In the second, 10 small groups were assessed on group participation without and with a token condition. Results of the first experiment were inconclusive though favorable; the second experiment resulted in a significant difference (t=15.41; P<.001, df=77) in group participation when tokens were delivered contingent upon group participation. The results indicate that token technology can be an effective technique to increase small group participation when a variety of back-up reinforcers is offered. The results are discussed in terms of possible applications of token technology within a university setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, W. C., Englemann, S. and Thomas, D. R. (1971). Teaching: A Course in Applied Psychology. Chicago: SRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F. (1972). Lecturing versus other methods of teaching: a review of research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalis, G. T. and Strasser, B. B. (1973). The open-ended discussion teaching strategy. The Journal of School Health, 43, 664–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. D. (1956). Lectures versus problem-solving in teaching elementary soil sections. Science Education, 40, 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, B. A. (1967). Teaching method effectiveness in relation to certain student characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 60, 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M. and Pennypacker, H. S. (1971). A behavioral approach to college teaching. American Psychologist, 26, 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., Roberts, M. D. and O'Neill, G. W. (1972). The measurement and analysis of college student study behavior in George Semb (Ed.) Behavior Analysis and Education — 1972. The University of Kansas Support and Development Center for Follow Through. Department of Human Development.

  • Kazdin, E. and Bootzin, R. (1972). The token economy: an evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 343–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1968). “Good-bye teacher...“ Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, L. and Krasner, M. (1973). Token economies and other planned environments in Carl E., Thoresen (Ed.) Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-Second Yearbook of the Nacional Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landreth, G. L. (1973). Dynamics of group discussion. Clearing House, 48, 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. A. (1972). The behavior-therapeutic use of contingency contracting to control an adult behavior problem: weight control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M. (1969). Good Frames and Bad: A Grammar of Frame Writing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. and Malaby, J. (1972). Intrinsic reinforcers in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D. and Drabman, R. (1971). Token reinforcement programs in the classrooms: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, S. (1974). Social reinforcement of study behavior by a proctor in a PSI course. Unpublished report, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1973). Some implications of making education more efficient. Behavior Modification in Education: The Seventy-Second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D., Rosenberg, L. and Bezdek, W. E. (1964). Teacher behavior and student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, W. C., Payne, J. S., Stainback, S. B. and Payne, R. A. (1973). Establishing A Token Economy in the Classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles A. Merill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallmadge, G. K. and Shearer, J. W. (1969). Relationships among learning styles, instructional methods, and the nature of learning experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. (1972). Academic responses and attitudes engendered by a programmed course in child development. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodarski, J. S. and Buckholdt, D. (1973). Behavioral instruction in college classrooms: a review of methodological procedures. Paper presented at the first annual conference on Behavior Research and Technology in Higher Education. Atlanta, October.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, T.M., Smith, B.V. Application of behavioral technology to small group discussion with university students. Instr Sci 5, 93–105 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120233

Keywords

Navigation