Skip to main content
Log in

The localization, diagnostic, and monitoring functions of student ratings in a model for improving university teaching

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A diversity of student questionnaires are used by colleges and universities to provide data on faculty teaching performance. Yet the purposes for collecting this data are frequently unclear, and at times superficial. Rarely is student rating data used as a tool to improve faculty teaching. A more relevant approach incorporates a variety of types of student ratings into a model for improving university teaching. One type of student rating data is used to identify broad instructional problem areas. Another type pinpoints probable causes and solutions for the instructional problems. Instructional improvement procedures are designed on the basis of this data. A third type of student rating data evaluates the instructional improvement procedures and indicates when modifications are needed. In addition to these three types of student ratings, and the generation of appropriate questionnaires, this paper presents an overview of the teaching improvement model and discusses its effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. and Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1972). Strategies for Improving College Teaching. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., and Menges, R. J. (1971). “Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness,” Review of Educational Research 41: 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, A. S., Webb, S. C., and Marks, E. (1970). “Student Perceptions of Engineering Instructor Behaviors and Their Relationships to the Evaluation of Instructors and Courses,” American Educational Research Journal 7: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, F. B. (1966). “Suggestions for Improvement of Teaching,” Improving College and University Teaching 14: 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • French-Lazovik, G. (1974). “Predictability of Students' Evaluations of College Teachers from Component Ratings,” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustad, J. W. (1961). “Policies and Practices in Faculty Evaluation,” Educational Record 42: 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, M., Wilson, R. C., and Dienst, E. R. (1971). Evaluating University Teaching. Berkeley, California: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A. and McKeachie, W. J. (1974). “The Evaluation of Teachers in Higher Education,” In F. N., Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of Research in Education. Itasca, Illinois: F. E. Peacock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. and Zimmerman, W. (1956). “College Teaching Ability, Scholarly Activity and Personality,” Journal of Educational Psychology 47: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E. and Feldhusen, J. F. (1971). “College Teaching Effectiveness,” Today's Education 60: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musella, D. (1971). “A Model for Improving College Teaching,” Improving College and University Teaching 19: 198–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punke, H. H. (1965). “Improvement in College Teaching,” Improving College and University Teaching 13: 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayder, N. F. (1968). “College Student Ratings of Instructors,” Journal of Experimental Education 37: 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalzreid, N. T. and Remmers, H. H. (1943). “A Factor Analysis of the Purdue Rating Scale for Instructors,” Journal of Educational Psychology 34: 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, H. R. and Crooks, T. J. (1973). “A Plan for the Comprehensive Evaluation of College Teaching,” Journal of Higher Education 44: 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, R. P. and Brammer, L. M. (1973). “The Ills of College Teaching: Diagnosis and Prescription,” Journal of Higher Education 44: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheehan, D.S. The localization, diagnostic, and monitoring functions of student ratings in a model for improving university teaching. Instr Sci 5, 77–91 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120232

Keywords

Navigation