Abstract
To find out whether a discrepancy between the instructor's and the student's evaluations of teaching influence teaching, 13 introductory and educational psychology instructors and their students were given a Student Opinion Questionnaire (SOQ) twice: on the fourth week of a fall term and eight weeks after feedback sessions with the instructors. The instructors received feedback on the direction and amount of initial discrepancy. The results showed that the unfavorable discrepant instructors (instructor rating better than students) changed more on skill, feedback, rapport, general teaching ability, and the overall value of the course than the favorably discrepant instructors (student ratings better than instructor). The unfavorably discrepant instructors improved their teaching significantly more than the favorably discrepant instructors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P. and Rosenberg, M. J. (1958). “Symbolic psycho-logic: A model of attitudinal cognition.” Behavioral Science, 3, 1–3.
Adams, J. S. (1963). “Toward an understanding of inequity.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.
Adams, J. S. and Rosenbaum, W. B. (1962). “The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 161–164.
Aronson, E. (1968). “Dissonance theory: Progress and problems.” In R. P., Abelson, E., Aronson, W. J., McGuire, T. M., Newcomb, M. J., Rosenberg, and P. H., Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Aronson, E. (1969). “The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective.” In L., Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.
Aronson, E. and Carlsmith, S. M. (1962). “Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psycgology. 65, 178–182.
Bramel, D. A. (1962). “A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 64, 121–129.
Bryan, R. C. (1963). Reactions to Teachers by Students. Parents and Administrators. (U.S. Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project 668). Kalamazoo, Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Centra, J. A. (1972a). Self-ratings of College Teachers: A Comparison with Student Ratings. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
Centra, J. A. (1972b). The Utility of Student Ratings for Instructional Improvement. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
Deutsch, M. and Solomon, L. (1959). “Reactions to evaluations by others as influenced by self-evaluations.” Sociometry, 22, 93–112.
Edlow, D. W., and Kiesler, C. A. (1966). “Ease of denial and defensive projection.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 56–69.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.
Gage, N. L., Runkel, P. J. and Chatterjee, B. B. (1963). “Changing teacher behavior through feedback from pupils: An application of equilibrium theory.” In W. W., Charters and N. L., Gage (Eds.). Readings in the Social Psychology of Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Glass, D. C. (1968). “Theories of consistency and the study of personality.” In E. F., Borgotta and W. W., Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago: and Rand McNally.
Harvey, O. J., Kelley, H. H., and Shapiro, M. M. (1957). “Reactions to unfavorable evaluations of the self made by other persons.” Journal of Personality, 25, 393–411.
Heider, F. (1958). The Pscyhology of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Wiley.
Isaacson, R. L., McKeachie, W. J. and Milholland, J. E. (1963). “Correlations of teacher personality variables and student ratings.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 110–117.
Isaacson, R. L., McKeachie, W. J., Milholland, J. E., Lin, Y. G., Hofeller, M., Baerwaldt, J. W. and Zinn, K. L. (1964). “Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 344–351.
McGuire, W. J. (1966). “The current status of cognitive consistency theories.” In S., Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive Consistency: Motivational Antecedents and Behavioral Consequents. New York: Academic Press.
McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G. and Mann, W. (1971). “Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies.” American Educational Research Journal. 8, 435–445.
Miller, M. T. (1971). “Instructors attitudes toward, and their use of, student ratings of teachers.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 235–239.
Newcomb, T. M. (1959). “Individual systems of orientation.” In S., Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Osgood, C. E. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). “The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.” Psychological Review, 62, 42–55.
Pambookian, H. S. (1972). The effect of feedback from students to college instructors on their teaching behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Pambookian, H. S. (1974). “Initial level of student evaluation of instruction as a source of influence on instructor change after feedback.” Journal of Educational Psychology. 66, 52–56.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). “A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework.” In S., Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rosenberg, M. (1962). “The association between self-esteem and anxiety.” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1, 135–151.
Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R. and Bonoma, T. B. (1971). “Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?” American Psychologist, 26, 685–695.
Tuckman, B. W. and Oliver, W. F. (1968). “Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of source.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 297–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on portions of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph. D. degree at the University of Michigan. The author wishes to acknowledge the help given by Wilbert J. McKeachie and Alvin F. Zander and thank them for their suggestions. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Que., August 1973.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pambookian, H.S. Discrepancy between instructor and student evaluations of instruction: Effect on instructor. Instr Sci 5, 63–75 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120231
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120231