Skip to main content
Log in

Computers and the emancipation of students: giving control to the learner

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers two basic models of the teaching-learning process, described as the “didactic” and the “communication” model. These are applied to Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) in order to demonstrate that CAL has generally embodied a didactic model of teaching and learning. This imposes an unnecessary restriction on the student's freedom to choose their (Note 1) learning style, and the paper discusses how it is possible for CAL to support a less didactic model and to give more control to the student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crombie, A. C. (1959). Augustine to Galileo 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Sessa, A. (1986). Artificial worlds and real experiences. Instructional Science, 14, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esland, G. M. (1971). Teaching and learning as the organization of knowledge, in M. F. D. Young, Knowledge and Control. Collier-Macmillan.

  • Feyerabend, P. (1970). Against Method. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 4.

  • Fry, J. P. (1972). Interactive relationship between inquisitiveness and student control of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. R. (1981). Learner initiatives in computer assisted learning, in J. Howe (ed), Microcomputers in Secondary Education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, R. (1961). Aristotle's Physics. University of Nebraska Press.

  • Laurillard, D. M. (1984). Interactive video and the control of learning. Educational Technology, 23, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. M. (in press). The different forms of learning in psychology and education, in J. Richardson, M. Eysenck & D. Warren Piper (eds), Student Learning. Guildford: SRHE.

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (1984). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. & Archer, D. (1977). The interpretation of NMR spectra. CALCHEM, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Leeds.

  • O'Shea, T. & Self, J. (1983). Learning and Teaching with Computers. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1973). CASTE: A system for exhibiting learning strategies and regulating uncertainties. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 5, 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laurillard, D. Computers and the emancipation of students: giving control to the learner. Instr Sci 16, 3–18 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120002

Keywords

Navigation