Abstract
Three surface-layer flux footprint models have been evaluated with the results of an SF6 tracer release experiment specifically designed to test such models. They are a Lagrangian stochastic model, an analytical model, and a simplified derivative of the analytical model. Vertical SF6 fluxes were measured by eddy correlation at four distances downwind of a near-surface crosswind line source in an area of homogeneous sagebrush. The mean fluxes were calculated for 136 half-hour test periods and compared to the fluxes predicted by the footprint models. All three models gave similar predictions and good characterizations of the footprint over the stability range -0.01 < z 0/L < 0.005. The predictions of the three models were within the limits of the uncertainty of the experimental measurements in all but a few cases within this stability range. All three models are unconditionally recommended for determining the area defined by the footprint over short vegetative canopies in this range. They are also generally appropriate for estimating flux magnitudes within the limits of experimental uncertainties. Most of the mean differences observed between the measured and predicted fluxes at each of the four towers reflect a tendency for the measured fluxes to be greater than those predicted by the three models. Rigorous verification of the models in strongly stable conditions was complicated by the need to obtain very accurate measurements of small fluxes in only marginally stationary conditions. Verification in strongly unstable conditions was hampered by the limited number of appropriate data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benner, R. L. and Lamb, B.: 1985, ‘A Fast Response Continuous Analyzer for Halogenated Atmospheric Tracers’, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 2, 582–589.
Dyer, A. J.: 1974, ‘A Review of Flux Profile Relationships’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 363–372.
Finn, D., Lamb, B., and Leclerc, M. Y.: 1996, ‘Modeling Scalar Source Footprints Using Near Real-Time Turbulence Measurements and Back-Trajectory Analysis’, Atmos. Env., in press.
Gryning. S. E., van Ulden, A. P., and Larsen, S. E.: 1983, ‘Dispersion from a Continuous Ground-Level Source Investigated by a K Model’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 109, 355–364.
Hojstrup, J.: 1993, ‘A Statistical Data Screening Procedure’, Meas. Sci. Technol. 4, 153–157.
Horst, T. W.: 1979, ‘Lagrangian Similarity Modeling of Vertical Diffusion from a Ground-Level Source’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 18, 733–740.
Horst, T. W. and Weil, J. C.: 1992, ‘Footprint Estimation for Scalar Flux Measurements in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 59, 279–296.
Horst, T. W. and Weil, J. C.: 1994, ‘How Far is Far Enough? The Fetch Requirements for Micrometeorological Measurement of Surface Fluxes’, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 11, 1018–1025.
Horst, T. W. and Oncley, S. P.: 1995, ‘Flux-PAM Measurement of Scalar Fluxes Using Cospectral Similarity’, 9th AMS Symp. Met. Obs. & Instrumentation, AMS, Charlotte, NC.
Kaimal, J. C., Gaynor, J. E., Zimmerman, H. A., and Zimmerman, G. A.: 1990, ‘Minimizing Flow Distortion Errors in a Sonic Anemometer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 53, 103–115.
Leclerc, M. Y., Thurtell, G. W., and Kidd, G. E.: 1988, ‘Measurements and Langevin Simulations of Mean Tracer Concentration Fields Downwind from a Circular Line Source Inside an Alfalfa Canopy’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 43, 287–308.
Leclerc, M. Y. and Thurtell, G. W.: 1990, ‘Footprint Predictions of Scalar Fluxes using a Markovian Analysis’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 52, 247–258.
Leclerc, M. Y., Shen, S., and Lamb, B.: 1995, ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of Footprints in the Convective Boundary Layer’, J. Geophys. Res., in press.
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. and van Ulden, A. P.: 1978, ‘A Numerical Study on the Vertical Dispersion of Passive Contaminants from a Continuous Source in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, Atmos. Environ. 12, 2119–2124.
Rosenberger, J. L. and Gasko, M.: 1983, ‘Comparing Location Estimators: Trimmed Means, Medians, and Trimean’, in Hoaglin, Mosteller, and Tukey (eds.), Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 297–338.
Schuepp, P. H., Leclerc, M. Y., MacPherson, J. I., and Desjardins, R. L.: 1990, ‘Footprint Prediction of Scalar Fluxes from Analytical Solutions of the Diffusion Equation’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 355–373.
van Ulden, A. P.: 1978, ‘Simple Estimates for Vertical Diffusion from Sources Near the Ground’, Atmos. Environ. 12, 2125–2129.
Wilson, J. C., Thurtell, G. W., and Kidd, G. E.: 1981, ‘Numerical Simulation of Particle Trajectories in Inhomogeneous Turbulence, II: Comparison of Predictions with Experimental Data for the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 21, 423–441.
Wilson, J. C., Legg, B. J., and Thomson, D. J.: 1983, ‘Calculation of Particle Trajectories in the Presence of a Gradient in Turbulent-Velocity Variance’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 27, 163–169.
Zhang, S. F., Wyngaard, J. C., Businger, J. A., and Oncley, S. P.: 1986, ‘Response Characteristics of the U.W. Sonic Anemometer’, J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 3, 315–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finn, D., Lamb, B., Leclerc, M.Y. et al. Experimental evaluation of analytical and Lagrangian surface-layer flux footprint models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80, 283–308 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119546
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119546