Skip to main content
Log in

Requirements for large-eddy simulation of surface wind gusts in a mountain valley

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the passage of a front, data from a light-weight cup anemometer and wind vane, sited in a steep-walled glacial valley of the Mt Cook region of the Southern Alps of New Zealand, were analysed to derive a power spectrum of the wind velocity for periods between 0.5 and 16 min. The energy spectrum roughly followed a -5/3 power law over the range of periods from 0.5–4 min — as might be expected in the case of an inertial subrange of eddies. However, any inertial subrange clearly does not extend to periods longer than this. We suggest that the observed eddies were generated in a turbulent wake associated with flow separation at the ridge crests, and large eddies are shed at periods of 4–8 min or more.

A compressible fluid-dynamic model, with a Smagorinsky turbulence closure scheme and a “law of the wall” at the surface, was used to calculate flow over a cross section through this area in neutrally stratified conditions. A range of parameters was explored to assess some of the requirements for simulating surface wind gusts in mountainous terrain in New Zealand.

In order to approximate the observed wind spectrum at Tasman aerodrome, Mount Cook, we found the model must be three-dimensional, with a horizontal resolution better than 250 m and with a Reynolds-stress eddy viscosity of less than 5 m2 s-1. In two-dimensional simulations, the eddies were too big in size and in amplitude and at the surface this was associated with reversed flow extending too far downstream. In contrast the three-dimensional simulations gave a realistic gusting effect associated with large scale “cat's paws” (a bigger variety of those commonly seen over water downstream of moderate hills), with reversed flow only at the steep part of the lee slope. The simulations were uniformly improved by better resolution, at all tested resolutions down to 250 m mesh size.

The spectra of large eddies simulated in steep terrain were not very sensitive to the details of the eddy stress formulation. We suggest that this is because boundary-layer separation is forced in any case by terrain-induced pressure gradients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C.: 1983, ‘Improved Turbulence Models Based on Large-Eddy Simulation of Homogeneous, Incompressible, Turbulent Flows’, Report No. TF-19, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. L. and Farley, R. D.: 1984, ‘Severe Downslope Windstorm Calculations in two and Three Spatial Dimensions using Anelastic Interactive Grid Nesting: A Possible Mechanism for Gustiness’, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, J. W.: 1980, ‘Stratocumulus-Capped Mixed Layers Derived from a Three-Dimensional Model’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18, 495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemp, J. B. and Wilhelmson, R. B.: 1978, ‘The Simulation of Three-Dimensional Convective Storm Dynamics’, J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1070–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraichnan, R.: 1967, ‘Inertial Ranges in Two-Dimensional Turbulence’, Phys. Fluids 10,1417–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A. J. and Thompson, D. J.: 1992, ‘Stochastic Backscatter in Large-Eddy Simulations of Boundary Layers’, J. Fluid Mech. 242, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P. J. and Brown, A. R.: 1994, ‘The Sensitivity of Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Shear Flow to Subgrid Models’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 70, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development of a Turbulence Closure Model for Geophysical Fluid Problems’, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. A., Cotton, W. R., Walko, R. L., Tremback, C. J., Lyons, W. A., Grasso, L. D., Nicholls, M. E., Moran, M. D., Wesley, D. A., Lee, T. J., and Copeland, J. H.: 1992, ‘A Comprehensive Meteorological Modelling System — RAMS’, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 49, 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnell, D. K., Revell, M. J., and McGavin, P. N.: 1995, ‘Field-Object Design of aNumerical Weather Prediction Model for Uni- and Multi-Processors’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 123, 401–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnell, D. K. and Revell, M. J.: 1993, ‘Energy-Bounded Flow Approximation on a Cartesian-Product Grid over Rough Terrain’, J. Comput. Phys. 107, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, K. and Ikawa, M.: 1991, ‘A Numerical Study of the Local Downslope Wind “Yamaji-kaze” in Japan’, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 69, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scinocca, J. F. and Peltier, W. R.: 1989, ‘Pulsating Downslope Windstorms’, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2885–2914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: 1992, ‘The Stability of Time-Split Numerical Methods for the Hydrostatic and the Nonhydostatic Elastic Equations’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 2109–2127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinski, J.: 1963, ‘General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations. Part 1: The Basic Experiment’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 91, 99–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J. L.: 1972, A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press, 300 pp.

  • Wood, N. and Mason, P. J.: 1993, ‘The Pressure Force Induced by Neutral, Turbulent Flow over Hills’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 514, 1233–1267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Revell, M.J., Purnell, D. & Lauren, M.K. Requirements for large-eddy simulation of surface wind gusts in a mountain valley. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80, 333–353 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119422

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119422

Keywords

Navigation