Abstract
Near-neutral measurements of the turbulent wind field within and above a sequence of 15 parallel windbreaks on a flat pastoral site are presented. The windbreak fences each had a porosity of 60% and were equally-spaced at 6 times their height (h = 2 m). The following conclusions seem justified for wind directions within 10 ° of the normal to the array:
-
1.
Above the windbreaks (2h), mean windspeeds first decreased and then increased asymptotically to a value in equilibrium with the new surface roughness. At 0.5h, windspeeds exhibited a slow increase down the entire array.
-
2.
Reflecting differences in approach flows, the drag on the initial fence was almost twice that on barriers farther downstream. This reduction in momentum extraction per windbreak was associated with an elevation in the zero-plane displacement to a level equal to 0.8h.
-
3.
At positions well-removed from the initial fences, mean windspeeds were reduced throughout the entire region below shelter height. In this region, the flow became increasingly dominated by downward moving air with velocities much greater than the local average. The zone of reduced turbulence was small, extending only 2h downstream of a barrier at a height of 0.25h. This corresponded with the region excluded from smoke trails released at the top of windbreaks.
-
4.
An approximate TKE budget mid-way between windbreaks 7 and 8 suggests that shear and wake production peak near z = h and that production is balanced by dissipation and vertical transport components. Advective and inertial interaction terms are negligible at this midway position but are likely to be major sources of TKE closer to the windbreak. Local equilibrium is attained above z = 1.5h implying the existence of a constant-stress layer.
The measurements show the practical difficulty of simultaneously reducing both mean windspeeds and turbulence levels with repeated windbreaks at conventional spacings for horticultural applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradley, E. F. and Mulhearn, P. J.: 1983, ‘Development of Velocity and Shear Stress Distributions in the Wake of a Porous Shelter’, J. Wind Engin. and Indust. Aero. 15, 145–156
Brown, G. L. and Roshko, A.: 1974, ‘On Density Effects and Large Structures in Turbulent Mixing Layers’, J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775–816.
Coppin, P. A.: 1985, ‘An Examination of Cup Anemometer Overspeeding’, Meteorol. Rdsch. 35, 1–11.
Corcos, G. M. and Sherman, F. S.: 1984, ‘The Mixing Layer: Deterministic Models of a Turbulent Flow. Part 1. Introduction and the Two Dimensional Flow’, J. Fluid Mech. 139, 29–25.
Finnigan, J. J.: 1979, ‘Turbulence in Waving Wheat. II Structure of Momentum Transfer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 213–236.
Finnigan, J. J.: 1983, ‘A Streamline Co-ordinate System for Distorted Turbulent Shear Flows’, J. Fluid Mech. 130, 241–258.
Finnigan, J. J. and Bradley, E. F.: 1983, ‘The Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budget Behind a Porous Barrier: An Analysis in Streamline Co-ordinates’. J. Wind Engin. and Industr. Aero. 15, 157–168.
Gao, W., Shaw, R. H., and Paw, U. K. T.: 1989, ‘Observation of Organised Structure in Turbulent Flow Within and Above a Forest Canopy’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 47, 349–378.
Guyot, G. and Seguin, B.: 1975, ‘Modification of Land Roughness and Resulting Microclimatic Effects: A Field Study in Brittany’, in D. A. de Vries and N. H. Afgan (eds.), Heat and Mass Transfer in the Biosphere. Part 1: Transfer Processes in the Plant Environment, Scripta Book Co., New York, pp. 467–478.
Guyot, G.: 1978, ‘Détermination des efforts exercés par le vent sur un brise-vent’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 15, 57–67.
Jackson, P. S.: 1981, ‘On the Displacement Height in the Logarithmic Velocity Profile’, J. Fluid Mech. 111, 15–25.
Jacobs, A. F. G.: 1985, ‘Turbulence Around a Thin Solid Fence’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 34, 315–322.
Landahl, M. T. and Mollo-Christensen, E.: 1986, Turbulence and Random Processes in Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 152 pp.
McAneney, K. J. and Judd, M. J.: 1987 ‘Comparative Shelter Strategies for Kiwifruit: a Mechanistic Interpretation of Wind Damage Measurements’, Agric. and Forest Meteorol. 39, 255–240.
McAneney, K. J., Baille, A., and Sappe, G.: 1988 ‘Turbulence Measurements During Mistral Winds with a 1-Dimensional Sonic Anemometer’, Bounday-Layer Meteorol. 42, 153–166.
Maitani, T.: 1979, ‘A Comparison of Turbulence Statistics in the Surface Layer Over Plant Canopies with Those Over Several Other Surfaces’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 213–222.
Monteith, J. L.: 1973, Principles of Environmental Physics, Edward Arnold, Great Britain, 241 pp.
Mulhearn, P. J. and Finnigan, J. J.: 1978, ‘Turbulent Flow Over a Very Rough Random Surface’, Bounday-Layer Meteorol. 15, 109–132.
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: 1984, Atmospheric Turbulence: Models and Methods for Engineering Applications, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 397 pp.
Plate, E. J.: 1971, ‘The Aerodynamics of Shelterbelts’, Agric. Meteorol. 8, 203–222.
Raine, J. K. and Stevenson, D. C.: 1977, ‘Wind Protection by Model Fences in a Simulated Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Ind. Aerodyn. 2, 159–180.
Raupach, M. R., Coppin, P. A., and Legg, B. J. P.: 1986, ‘Experiments on Scalar Dispersion Within a Model Canopy. Part 1: The Turbulence Structure’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 35, 21–52.
Raupach, M. R.: 1988, ‘Canopy Transport Processes’, in W. L. Steffen and O. T. Denmead (eds.), Flow and Transport in the Natural Environment: Advances and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 95–127.
Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., and Brunet, Y.: 1989, ‘Coherent Eddies in Vegetation Canopies’, in Proceedings of ‘The Fourth Australasian Heat and Mass Transfer Conference’, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 75–90.
Seguin, B. and Gignoux, N.: 1974, ‘Etude expérimentale de l'influence d'un réseau de brise-vent sur le profil vertical de vitesse du vent’, Agric. Meteorol. 13, 15–33.
Shaw, R. H. and McCartney, H. A.: 1985, ‘Gust Penetration into Plant Canopies’, Atmos. Environ. 19, 827–830.
Shaw, R. H. and Seginer, I.: 1987, ‘Calculation of Velocity Skewness in Real and Artificial Canopies’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 39, 315–322.
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J. L.: 1972. A First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 300 pp.
Thom, A. S.: 1971, ‘Momentum Absorption by Vegetation’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 414–428.
Townsend, A. A.: 1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 429 pp.
van Eimern, J., Karschon, R., Razumova, L. A., and Robertson, G. W.: 1964, ‘Windbreaks and Shelterbelts’, World Meteorol. Org. Technical Note 59, 191 pp.
Wilson, J. D.: 1987, ‘On the Choice of a Windbreak Porosity Profile’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 38, 37–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAneney, K.J., Judd, M.J. Multiple windbreaks: An aeolean ensemble. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 54, 129–146 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119416
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119416