Skip to main content
Log in

The specification of models of campaign finance

Comments on the Jacobson and the Poole and Romer papers

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

4. Summary

Simultaneous models exist in the literature with specifications preferable to those used in either of these papers. The more complete models are of course still subject to improvement. The measure of ideology used by Poole and Romer would probably be such an improvement. Identification of a variable which would remove the anomalous result discussed by Jacobson would also greatly improve our understanding of the political process. It may be that a radically new approach to estimation will supplant these models. However, as long as scholars continue to perform estimations of equations such as those presented in (1a) - (1c) above, it is incumbent upon them to use the most complete specification available in the literature; using less complete specifications may sometimes enable us to answer specific, relatively narrow questions, but such specifications will not advance our fundamental understanding of the political process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.R. (1964) An Analysis of Transformation, J. Royal Statistical Society, 26: 211–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. and Tidewell, P.W. (1962) Transformation of the Independent Variables, Technometrics, 4: 531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1982) Congressmen, Constituents, and Contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B., Keenan, D. and Rubin, P.H. (1982) A General Equilibrium Model of Congressional Voting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May: 271–293.

  • Zarembka, P. (1974) Transformation of Variables in Econometrics, Frontiers in Econometrics, (ed.) P. Zarembka, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Federal Trade Commission. The views are those of the author and do not reflect the position of the FTC or other members of its staff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kau, J.B., Rubin, P.H. The specification of models of campaign finance. Public Choice 47, 113–119 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119354

Keywords

Navigation