Abstract
One-year-old shoots from stooling beds of Populus × deltoides ‘Walker’ and Populus jackii ‘Northwest’ were collected in late fall to determine the effect of cutting position on rooting and growth of hardwood poplar cuttings. Cuttings with a minimum diameter of 9.0 mm were obtained from basal, middle and distal locations on the poplar shoot. Rooting and shoot growth were assessed in the greenhouse and under field conditions. ‘Walker’ poplar cuttings collected from basal portions of the shoot and planted in the field had 87.6% rooting and 103.8 cm growth compared to 78.8% and 103.4 cm and 67.6% and 88.8 cm for middle and distal locations respectively. For ‘Northwest’ rooting and growth under field conditions was 84.4% and 94.7 cm for basal, 78.4% and 90.5 cm for mid and 64.4% and 84.3 cm for distal locations. Rooting in the greenhouse was superior to the field. ‘Walker’ cuttings had fewer roots and buds per cutting than ‘Northwest’, however, growth of ‘Walker’ in the field was superior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, N. S. 1937. Some samples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. Roy. Stat. Soc. Supp. 4: 137–140.
Bloomberg, W. J. 1959. Root formation of black cottonwood in relation to region of parent shoot. For. Chron. 35: 13–17.
Bloomberg, W. J. 1963. The significance of initial adventitious roots in poplar cuttings and the effect of certain factors on their development. For. Chron. 39: 279–289.
Bowersox, T. W. 1970. Influence of cutting size on juvenile growth and survival of hybrid poplar clone NE-388. Tree Planter's Notes 21(4):1–3.
Cram, W. H. 1969. A new hardwoods cutting planter. Tree Planter's Notes 19(4):24.
Cram, W. H. and C. H. Lindquist 1982. Refrigerated storage of hardwood cuttings of willow and poplar. Tree Planter's Notes 33(4): 3–5.
Dickman, H. Phipps and D. Netzer 1980. Cutting diameter influences early survival and growth of several Populus clones. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note NC-261. 4p.
Dickman, D. I. and K. W. Stuart 1983. The Culture of Poplars in Eastern North America. Michigan State Univ. East Lansing, Mich. 168 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations 1958. Poplars in Forestry and Land Use. FAO Forestry and Forest Products Studies No. 12. 511 p.
Fege, A. S. and G. N. Brown 1984. Carbohydrate distribution in dormant Populus shoots and hardwood cuttings. Forest Sci. 30(4): 999–1010.
Hansen, E. A. and D. N. Tolsted. 1981. Effect of cutting diameter and stem or branch position on establishment of a difficult-to-root clone of a Populus alba hybrid. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 723–727.
Lindquist, C. H., Cram, W. H. and J. A. G. Howe 1977. Walker poplar. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:1019.
Ostry, M. E. and H. S. McNabb, Jr. 1982. Preventing blackstem damage to Populus hardwood cuttings. pp. 36–43. In Proceedings North American Poplar Council Annual Meeting, Rhineland, WI.
Peterson, L. A. and H. M. Phipps 1976. Water soaking pretreatment improves rooting and early survival of hardwood cuttings of some Populus clones. Tree Planter's Notes 27(1): 12–22.
Phipps, H. M. and D. A. Netzer 1981. The influence of collection time and storage temperature on Populus hardwood cutting development. Tree Planter's Notes 32(4): 33–36.
Phipps, H. M. Hansen, E. A. and A. S. Fege 1983. Preplant soaking of dormant Populus hardwood cuttings. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Rep. NC-241, 8p.
Smith, N. G. and P. F. Wareing 1972a. The distribution of latent root primordia in stems of Populus robusta and factors affecting the emergence of preformed roots from cuttings. Forestry 45: 197–209.
Smith, N. G. and P. F. Wareing 1972b. Rooting of hardwood cuttings in relation to bud dormancy and the auxin content of excised stems. New Phytol. 71: 63–80.
Ying, C. C. and W. T. Bagley 1977. Variation in rooting capability of Populus deltoides. Silvae Genetica26: 204–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeder, W.R., Walker, D.S. Effect of cutting position on rooting and shoot growth of two poplar clones. New Forest 4, 281–289 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119207
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119207