Skip to main content
Log in

An AI approach for wastewater treatment systems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most wastewaters consist of several contaminants (compounds) that need to be removed during the treatment process. A treatability database has been developed containing the treatability of various compounds through different types of treatment processes. In most wastewaters several compounds appear together and two or more treatment processes in series may be needed to meet the effluent limits of the contaminants. The proposed AI wastewater treatment system consists of two phases, analysis phase and synthesis phase. In the analysis phase, an inductive learning algorithm with a grammar based knowledge representation is used to extract knowledge rules from the database. These rules are combined with another set of rules obtained from the experts. All these rules are arranged together to identify the effect of an individual treatment process on several compounds at various concentrations. In the synthesis phase, knowledge rules generated from the analysis phase are used to obtain the sequence of technologies that can satisfy the necessary treatment constraints. Two different methodologies are developed to generate the sequence of technologies. In the first approach, the synthesis phase is formulated as a search problem and a heuristic search function is developed. In the second approach, the synthesis phase is formulated as an optimization problem and a Hopfield neural network is used to obtain the sequence of technologies. Both approaches are compared for the optimality of the solution and the processing time required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.A. Rossman, “A hybrid knowledge-based/algorithmic approach to the design of waste treatment systems,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Sixth Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, 1989.

  2. L.A. Rossman, “Synthesis of waste treatment systems by implicit enumeration,” Journal WPCF, vol. 52, no.1, pp. 147–160, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.A.B. Gall and G.G. Patry, “Knowledge-based system for the diagnosis of an activated sludge plant,” in Dynamic Modeling and Expert Systems in Wastewater Engineering, edited by G.G. Patry and D. Chapman, Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.T. Chapman, G.G. Patry and R.D. Hill, “Dynamic modeling and expert systems in wastewater engineering: Trends, problems, needs,” in Dynamic Modeling and Expert Systems in Wastewater Engineering, edited by G.G. Patry and D. Chapman, Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, pp. 345–370, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WERL Treatability Database, Water and Hazardous Waste Treatment Research Division, USEPA, Cincinnati Ohio.

  6. J.R. Quinlan, “Discovering rules from large collection of examples: A case study,” in Expert Systems in the Micro Electronic Age, edited by D. Michie, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.R. Quinlan, “Induction of decision trees,” Machine Learning, vol. 1, pp. 81–106, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Quinlan, “Simplifying decision trees,” Artificial Intelligence Lab., MIT, Cambridge, MA, A.I. Memo. 930, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Krovvidy and W.G. Wee, “Retargetable rule generation for expert systems,” in Proc. of the Colloquia as a Part of the Third Int'l Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Turin, Italy, 1988, pp. 37–46.

  10. R.D. Cameron and M.R. Ito, “Grammar-based definition of metaprogramming systems,” ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 6, no.1, pp. 20–54, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Knaus and C. Jay, “Transporting knowledge bases: A standard,” AI Expert, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 34–39, November 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.C. Gumerman, B.E. Burris, and H.P. Sigurd, Small Water System Costs, Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual, EPA-430/9-78-009.

  14. M. Atkins, “Sorting by Hopfield net,” in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 2, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 65–68.

  15. J.J. Hopfield and D.W. Tank, “Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 52, pp. 141–152, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Ramanujam and P. Sadayyapan, “Parameter identification for constrained optimization using neural networks,” in Proceedings of the Connectionist Models Summer School, 1988, pp. 154–161.

  17. J.D. Dyer and N.A. Mignone, Handbook of Industrial Residues, Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Artificial Intelligence & Computer Vision Laboratory, University of Cincinnati

Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krovvidy, S., Wee, W.G., Summers, R.S. et al. An AI approach for wastewater treatment systems. Appl Intell 1, 247–261 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118999

Key words

Navigation