Skip to main content
Log in

Elasto-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of formulating and numerically solving the equations of motion for a multibody system undergoing large motion and clasto-plastic deformations is considered here. Based on the principles of continuum mechanics and the finite element method, the equations of motion for a flexible body are derived. It is shown that the use of a lumped mass formulation and the description of the nodal accelerations relative to a nonmoving reference frame lead to a simple form of these equations. In order to reduce the number of coordinates that describe a deformable body, a Guyan condensation technique is used. The equations of motion of the complete multibody system are then formulated in terms of joint coordinates between the rigid bodies. The kinematic constraints that involve flexible bodies are introduced in the equations of motion through the use of Lagrange multipliers.

In this paper the following general rules will apply:

  1. (a)

    Matrices and higher order tensors are in boldface upper-case characters.

  2. (b)

    Column and algebraic vectors are in boldface lower-case characters.

  3. (c)

    Scalars are in lightface characters.

  4. (d)

    Summation convention is applied when tensors are written on component form.

  5. (e)

    Left superscript denotes the configuration in which an event occurs.

  6. (f)

    Left subscript denotes the configuration to which an event is refered to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamal, M. M., ‘Analysis and simulation of vehicle to barrier impact’, SAE Transactions, SAE paper n. 700414, 1970.

  2. Kamal M. M. and Lin K. H., ‘Collision simulation’, in M. M. Kamal and J. A. Wolf (eds.), Modern Automotive Structural Analysis, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1982, 316–355.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ni, C.-M. and Song, J. O., ‘Computer-aided design analysis methods for vehicle structural crashworthiness’, in P. Tong, C.-M. Ni and A. King (eds.), Symposium on Vehicle Crashworthiness Including Impact Biomechanics, ASME, 1986, 125–139.

  4. Nikravesh P. E., Chung I. S., and Benedict R. L., ‘Plastic hinge approach to vehicle crash simulation’, J. Comp. Struct. 16, 1983, 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, I. S., Nikravesh, P. E., and Arora, J. S., ‘Automobile simulation using a general purpose rigid body dynamic analysis program’, ASME Comp. Meth. Ground Transportation Vehicles, A. Dm., 1982, 50.

  6. Thompson B. S. and Sung C. K., ‘Survey of finite element techniques for mechanism design’, Mech. Mach. Theory 21, 1986, 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Song J. O. and Haug E. J., ‘Dynamic analysis of planar flexible mechanisms’, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng, 24, 1980, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sunada W. and Dubowsky S., ‘The application of the finite element methods to the dynamic analysis of flexible spatial and co-planar linkage systems’, ASME J. Mech. Design 103, 1981, 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shabana, A., ‘Dynamic analysis of large scale inertia variant flexible systems,’ Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, 1982.

  10. Shabana A. and Wehage R. A., ‘A coordinate reduction technique for dynamic analysis of spatial substructures with large angular rotations’, J. Struct. Mech. 11, 1983, 401–431.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bakr E. M. and Shabana A., ‘Geometrically nonlinear analysis of multibody systems’, Comp. Struct. 23, 1986, 739–751.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kane T. R., Ryan R. R., and Banerjee A. K., ‘Comprehensive theory for the dynamics of a general beam attached to a moving rigid base’, J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics 10, 1987, 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan, R. R., ‘Use of discrete examples to study dynamic modelling methods for flexible bodies undergoing large overall motion and small deformation, part 1’, ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1987.

  14. Oden, J. T., Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua, McGraw-Hill, 1972.

  15. Hibbit H. D., Marcal P. V., and Rice J. R., ‘A finite element formulation for problems of large strain and large displacements’, Int. J. Solids Struct. 6, 1970, 1069–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McMeeking R. M. and Rice J. R., ‘Finite element formulations for problems of large elastic-plastic deformation’, Int. J. Solids Struct. 11, 1975, 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bathe K.-J., Ramm E., and Wilson E. L., ‘Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis’, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 9, 1975, 353–386.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bathe K.-J. and Ozdemir H., ‘Elastic-plastic large deformation static and dynamic analysis’, Comp. Struct. 6, 1976, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bathe K.-J. and Bolourchi S., ‘Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures’, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 14, 1979, 961–986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Belytscko T. and Hsieh B. J., ‘Nonlinear finite element analysis with convected coordinates’, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 7, 1973, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Argyris J. H. and Doltsinis J. S., ‘On the large strain inelastic analysis in natural formulation: dynamic problems’, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 21, 1980, 91–126.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nygard M. K. and Bergan P. G., ‘Advances on treating large rotations for nonlinear problems’, in A. K. Noor and J. T. Oden (eds.), State of the Art Surveys on Computational Mechanics, ASME, New York, 1989, 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Greenwood, D. T., Principles of Dynamics, Prentice-Hall, 1965.

  24. Ambrosio J. A. C., Nikravesh P. E., and Pereira M. S., ‘Crashworthiness analysis of a truck’, Math. Comput. Modelling 14, 1990, 959–964.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Surana K. S., ‘Lumped mass matrices with non-zero inertia for general shell and axisymmetric shell elements‘, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 12, 1978, 1635–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zienkiewicz, O. C., The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, 1977.

  27. Nikravesh, P. E., Computer Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, 1988.

  28. Nikravesh P. E., ‘Systematic reduction of multibody equations of motion to a minimal set’, Int. J. Non-Linear Mechanics 25, 1990, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nikravesh, P. E. and Gim, G. H., ‘Systematic construction of the equations of motion for multibody systems containing closed kinematic loops’, in Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, Montreal, Canada, Sept. 17–20, 1989.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Notation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrosio, J.A.C., Nikravesh, P.E. Elasto-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn 3, 85–104 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118987

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118987

Key words

Navigation