Abstract
We characterize and study the relationship between income redistributions that are just and stable. We assume that for a given economy there exists a set of possible income redistributions, the constitution of the economy. The choice of redistribution is in the hands of the agents, who decide by majority vote. A stable redistribution is one that majority vote cannot alter when each agent tries to maximize his income.
A just redistribution is defined thus: in the set of all possible redistributions it is the one that leads to an income distribution which, when viewed as a lottery, optimizes the expected von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function of the agents of the economy. We assume that all agents have the same utility function, that is, the same attitude toward risk.
We postulate a trade-off between efficiency and egalitarianism and derive and analyze conditions for just and stable redistributions. We look for the characteristics of initial income distributions that make just and stable redistributions identical.
In an example we show how a certain tax schedule on productive work implies certain income redistributions.
This work was completed when I, as a research fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, was a guest of the Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Universität Mannheim. I would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Fakultät, and the Sonderforschungsbereich 5, Universität Mannheim, for their support.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arrow, K.J. (1970). The theory of risk aversion. In Essays in the theory of risk-bearing, 90–120. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Aumann, R.J., and Kurz, M. (1977). Power and taxes. Econometrica 45 (July): 1137–1161.
Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Diamond, P.A., and Mirrlees, J.A. (1971:1). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency. The American Economic Review 61 (March): 9–27.
Diamond, P.A., and Mirrlees, J.A. (1971:2). Optimal taxation and public production II: Tax rules. The American Economic Review 61 (June): 261–278.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63 (August): 309–321.
Howe, R.E., and Roemer, J.E. (1981). Rawlsian justice as the core of a game. The American Economic Review 71 (December): 880–895.
Intriligator, M.D. (1979). Income redistribution: A probabilistic approach. The American Economic Review 69 (March): 97–105.
Meltzer, A.H., and Richard, S.F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89 (October): 914–927.
Mirrlees, J.A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies 38(2): 175–208.
Phelps, E.S. (1976). Recent developments in welfare economics: Justice et équité. In M.D. Intriligator (Ed.), Frontiers of quantitative economics, Vol. IIIB, 701–730. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sheshinski, E. (1972). The optimal linear income-tax. Review of Economic Studies 39(3): 297–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank the Editors of this journal and anonymous referees for many helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this essay which have greatly helped to improve the end product.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wickström, BA. Economic justice and economic power: An inquiry into distributive justice and political stability. Public Choice 43, 225–249 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118935
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118935