Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determining literariness in interactive fiction

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors of interactive fiction are beginning to demonstrate a concern for the literariness of their product. Literariness, as defined by Shklovskij and the Russian Formalists, is the quality of “making strange” that which is linguistically familiar, a quality Shklovskij termed ostranenie. By applying the principle of ostranenie, as well as other well-known literary principles, to the most serious interactive fictions, we can determine if this new genre exhibits the features of literariness. A study of Mindwheel, Brimstone, Breakers, A Mind Forever Voyaging, Portal, and Trinity suggest that the literariness of interactive fiction comes out of its concern both for “making strange” what is familiar and for “making familiar” what is strange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Douglas and Steve Meretzky. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Adapted from the novel by Douglas Adams. Cambridge, Mass: Infocom, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barol, Bill. “Zorked Again: Lost in Computer Fiction”. Newsweek, December 23, 1985, p. 70.

  • British, Lord. Ultima IV. Manchester, NH: Origin Systems, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, Bill. Essex. San Rafael, California: Synapse-Broderbund, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, Victor. Russian Formalism: History-Doctrine. 'S-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co., 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gygax, Gary. Dungeons and Dragons. Lake Geneva, Wisc.: TSR, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Ihab. “Pluralism in Modern Perspective”. Critical Inquiry, 12, 3 (1986), 503–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Terence. Structuralism and Semiotics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Norman. “Literature as Transaction”. In What Is Literature? Ed. Paul Hernadi. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978, pp. 206–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang. “Indeterminacy and the Reader's Response”. In Aspects of Narrative. Ed. J. Hillis Miller. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971, pp. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics”. In Style and Language. Ed. Thomas Sebeok. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1960, pp. 350–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton: University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Samuel. “Preface to Shakespeare”. In Criticism: The Major Statements. 2nd ed. Ed. Charles Kaplan. New York: St. Martin's, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonell, Diane. Theories of Discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meretzky, Steve. A Mind Forever Voyaging. Cambridge, Mass: Infocom, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel, Philip, et al. The Hobbit. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, Brian. Trinity. Cambridge, Mass: Infocom, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesz, Anthony J. and Norman N. Holland. “Interactive Fiction”. Critical Inquiry, 11, 1 (1984), 110–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Digital Enterprises. Macbeth. Baltimore: The Avalon Hill Game Company, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, James. Brimstone. San Rafael, California: Synapse-Broderbund, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky, Robert. Mindwheel. San Rafael, California: Synapse-Broderbund, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky, Robert. “The Figured Wheel”. History of My Heart. New York: Ecco, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Neil. Storm of Dust. New York: Tor, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Neil. Seven No-Trump. New York: Tor, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, Robert. Semiotics and Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovskij, Viktor. Literatura i Kinematograf. Berlin, 1923. Quoted in Erlich, p. 227.

  • Smith, Rod. Breakers. San Rafael, California: Broderbund, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swigrat, Rob. Portal. Mountain View, California: Activision, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telarium Corp. Nine Princes in Amber. Cambridge, Mass: Telarium, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D. C. and Ian Weatherburn. The Neverending Story. Chatsworth, CA: Datasoft, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, Rene, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R. A. The Poem as Utterance. London: Methuen, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Neil Randall

Authors
  1. Neil Randall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Neil Randall has published several role-playing games, and is working on a full-length critical study of interactive fiction. He is currently assistant professor of English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randall, N. Determining literariness in interactive fiction. Comput Hum 22, 183–191 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118891

Key Words

Search

Navigation