Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biased ballots? The impact of ballot structure on North Carolina elections in 1992

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

North Carolina state election law gives county election boards broad authority to determine the form of the ballot used in federal, state, and local races. This paper examines the extent to which ballot formats appear to be strategically chosen and the impact of ballot design on 1992 North Carolina elections. Our results indicate that the form of the ballot influenced the decisions of some voters in statewide races in 1992 and that the design of the ballot may have been chosen strategically by county election boards dominated by the members of one party.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrington, T.S. (1978). Partisan campaigns, ballots, and voting patterns: The case of Charlotte. Urban Affairs Quarterly 14: 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R. (1986). Position effects with party column ballots. Western Political Quarterly 39: 648–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R. and Schneider, A. (1989). Confusing ballots, roll-off, and the black vote. Western Political Quarterly 42: 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V.O. (1958). Politics, parties, and pressure groups. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, G.B. (1986). Lost votes: Effects of methods of voting on participation Iowa 1920–1984. Iowa City: University of Iowa Institute of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J.G. (1993). Election closeness and voter turnout: Evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice 76: 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. and Levine, M.E. (1978). A model of agenda influence on committee decisions. American Economic Review 68: 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taebel, D.A. (1975) The effect of ballot position on electoral success. American Journal of Political Science 19: 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (1968). Voting machines and voter participation in four Michigan Constitutional Revision Referenda. Western Political Quarterly 21: 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (1966). Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of office block and party columns ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science 10: 448–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University, Box 90245, 27708-0245, Durham, NC

    James T. Hamilton & Helen F. Ladd

Authors
  1. James T. Hamilton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen F. Ladd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We would like to thank Dale Rhoda, Justin Hoagland, and Steven J. Balla for their expert research assistance and James Loewen, Glen Newkirk, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, J.T., Ladd, H.F. Biased ballots? The impact of ballot structure on North Carolina elections in 1992. Public Choice 87, 259–280 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118648

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118648

Keywords

Search

Navigation