Conclusion
It is worth repeating that causality testing is a very complex task. The diversity of views on interpreting the definition of causality and on the methods for testing causality highlight this issue. In our study, we cite an excellent article which provides a detailed critique of various problems associated with causality tests (see Conway, et al., 1984). It would appear that Chowdhury's comment draws very strong conclusions and fails to consider some of the complex theoretical issues regarding causality tests as well as important data problems pertaining to state and local governments. Moreover, we find it somewhat curious that, given the strong similarities in our two studies, Chowdhury prefers to dwell on the mechanics of an alternative technique rather than concentrate on the fact that his alternative technique yields supporting results to our 1987 paper on the tax-spend hypothesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Blackley, P.R. (1986). Causality between revenues and expenditures and the size of the federal budget. Public Finance Quarterly 14: 139–156.
Chowdhury, A.R. (1988). Expenditures and receipts in state and local government finances: Comment. Public Choice 59: 277–285.
Conway, R.K., Swamy, P.A.V.B., Yanagida, J.F., and Muehln, P. von zur. (1984). The impossibility of causality testing. Agricultural Economics Research 36 (Summer): 1–19.
Guilkey, D.K., and Salemi, M.K. (1982). Small sample properties of three tests for Granger-causal ordering a bivariate stochastic process. Review of Economics and Statistics 64: 668–680.
Manage, N., and Marlow, M.L. (1986). The causal relation between federal expenditures and receipts. Southern Economic Journal 52 (January): 617–629.
Marlow, M.L., and Manage, N. (1987). Expenditures and receipts: Testing for causality in state and local government finances. Public Choice 53: 243–255.
Mehra, Y. (1977). Money wages, prices, and causality. Journal of Political Economy 85: 1227–1244.
Ram, R. (1988). Additional evidence on causality between government revenue and government expenditure. Southern Economic Journal 54: 763–769.
Williams, D., Goodhart, C.A.E., and Gowland, D.H. (1976). Money, income and causality. American Economic Review 66: 417–423.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marlow, M.L., Manage, N. Expenditures and receipts in state and local government finances: Reply. Public Choice 59, 287–290 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118542
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118542
Keywords
- Local Government
- Public Finance
- Complex Task
- Important Data
- Alternative Technique