Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deciding final clusters: An approach using intra- and intercluster distances

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach for deciding final clusters of a dendrogram is provided. Whether developed by agglomerative or divisive cluster analysis, decisions start at the 2-cluster level of the dendrogram. Cluster density is viewed as compactness and, therefore, is related to interindividual distances. The two clusters and the intercluster space are seen as treatments in analysis of variance with intercluster space as the control treatment. Distances in an interindividual matrix are considered measures of response to the three treatments. The F-ratio indicates if the treatment means differ; the least significant difference indicates which ones are different. The example provided explains our approach in searching for optimal clustering levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Edwards, A. W. F. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., 1965. A method for cluster analysis. Biometrics 21: 362–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B., 1974. Cluster analysis. John Wiley Sons, New York. 133 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A., 1975. Clustering algorithms. John Wiley Sons, New York. 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. S., 1980. A stopping rule for partitioning dendrograms. Bot. Gaz. 141: 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancey, R. C., 1974. Algorithm for detection of discontinuities in data sets. Vegetatio 29: 131–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. 1973 Divisive polythetic classification of vegetation data by optimized division on ordination components. J. Ecol. 61: 753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1976. IRGRPS-An interactive algorithm for group recognition with an example from Spartinetea. Vegetatio 32: 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegatation research, 2nd ed., Junk, The Hague. 451 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C., 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wiley Sons, New York. 385 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, R. W., 1974. An introduction to quantitative ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York. 532 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 481 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T. & Lambert, J. M., 1959. Multivariate methods in plant ecology. I. Association analysis in plant communities. J. Ecol. 47: 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. C., 1969. Ecology and successional patterns of wet meadows, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, Ph. D. Diss., Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City. 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 93710, Fresno, CA, USA

    D. Ratliff

  2. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, 88003, Las Cruces, NM, USA

    R. D. Pieper

Authors
  1. D. Ratliff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. D. Pieper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratliff, D., Pieper, R.D. Deciding final clusters: An approach using intra- and intercluster distances. Vegetatio 48, 83–86 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117364

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117364

Keywords

Search

Navigation