Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamics of effective performance evaluation systems in education: Conceptual, human relations, and technical domains

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

High-quality performance evaluation systems in education are fundamental to both individual improvement and organizational effectiveness. The design and implementation of such systems require far more than a casual effort on the part of the decision makers within the organization. If worthwhile performance evaluation systems are to be effectuated, particular attention must be paid to the conceptual, human relations, and technical domains. Indeed, systems that incorporate the relevant issues found in this triad address a fundamental rule of performance evaluation: if it is worth doing, it is worth doing well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Conley, D.T. (1987). Critical attributes of effective evaluation systems. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L.L., & Schwab, D.P. (1973). Performance in organizations: Determinants and appraisals. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, P.S. (1987). Performance management in education. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, N.E. (1985). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation, Stufflebean, D.L. Chair. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W.J. (1988), Educational evaluation, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern, G.B. (1980). Evaluating teachers and administrators: A performance objectives approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, W. (1985). School principals as effective leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In: R. Tyler, R. Gagne, and M. Scriven, (Eds.) AERA monograph on curriculum evaluation: No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, pp. 39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.F., & Andrews, R.L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J.H., & Helm, V. (1991). Evaluation of professional support personnel in educational settings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. Maudaus, M.S. Scriven, and D.L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services in evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, pp. 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D.L., Ault, P.H., & Agee, W.K. (1989). Public relations strategies and tactics, 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stronge, J.H. The dynamics of effective performance evaluation systems in education: Conceptual, human relations, and technical domains. J Pers Eval Educ 5, 77–83 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117288

Keywords

Navigation