Skip to main content
Log in

Resistive SQUID calorimetry at low temperatures

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A resistive SQUID may be used to measure heat current. We call an RSQUID used in such a way an RSqUID: It acts as a heat-current to frequency (q−f) converter of sensitivity β=f/q. Two methods of heat capacity measurement by the use of an RSqUID are described. In the direct method the number of cycles of oscillation when the temperature of the RSqUID and specimen is changed by δT is counted. The measured heat capacity C m (to be corrected for the addenda) is given by Cm=n/(βΔT). In the step method the specimen and heater together are separated from the RSqUID by a thermal resistance R. The RSqUID is biased to a frequency f 1. The heater is switched on and a number of cycles is obtained which represents the amount of heat required to bring the specimen to equilibrium in the new steady state, in which f=f2+δf. By this method the quantity Cm=n/(Rδf) is obtained. In both methods the heat current is integrated by counting to obtain an amount of heat Q=n/β, which may thus be measured very precisely if the number of cycles is sufficiently large [and β(T) calibrated accurately]. The first RSqUID constructed for heat capacity measurement is described. In this RSqUID the high thermal resistance of press contacts has been avoided and soft solder as well as niobium used for superconducting material. The sensitivity β varied from 0.8 to 0.4 Hz nW−1 between 2 and 7 K. The results of measurements made between 2 and 7K by the step method with this RSqUID in a rather unsophisticated cryostat achieved a relative accuracy of ~0.1% with samples of mass about 1 g. Results of measurements made on samples of pure copper and indium are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. Zimmerman, J. A. Cowen, and A. H. Silver, Appl. Phys. Lett. 9, 353 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. Kamper and J. E. Zimmerman, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 132 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. G. Park, Superconductor Applications, SQUIDs and Machines, B. B. Schwarz and S. Foner, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1976), p. 415.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. G. Park, in Superconducting Interference Devices and Their Applications (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1977), p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. G. Park and A. W. Vaidya, J. Phys. (Paris) 39, C6–1228 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. D. Josephson, Adv. Phys. 14, 419 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. G. Park, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4, 2239 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. G. Park and J. P. Kendall, in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Low Temp Phys. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975), Vol. 3, p. 1645.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. T. Harding and J. E. Zimmerman, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1581 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. H. Silver, J. E. Zimmerman, and R. A. Kamper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 11, 209 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Park, D. E. Farrell, and J. P. Kendall, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4, 2169 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Soulen and M. Marshak, in Proc. Conf. Appl. Superconductivity, Annapolis, Maryland (IEEE, New York, 1972), p. 588.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. J. Morin and J. P. Maita, Phys. Rev. 129, 1115 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Bachmann, F. J. DiSalvo, T. H. Geballe, R. L. Greene, R. E. Howard, C. N. King, H. C. Kirsch, K. N. Lee, R. E. Schwall, H. U. Thomas, and R. B. Zubeck, Rev. Sci. Instr. 43, 205 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Kamper, in Superconductor Applications, SQUIDs and Machines, B. B. Schwarz and S. Foner, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1976), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Berman and C. F. Mate, Nature 182, 1661 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. K. C. McDonald, W. B. Pearson, and I. M. Templeton, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 266, 161 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kjekshus and W. B. Pearson, Can. J. Phys. 40, 98 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. J. Tainsh and G. K. White, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1329 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. Holste, T. C. Cetas, and C. A. Swenson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 43, 670 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. R. O'Neal and N. E. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 137A, 748 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J.G., Vaidya, A.W. Resistive SQUID calorimetry at low temperatures. J Low Temp Phys 40, 247–274 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117118

Keywords

Navigation