Skip to main content
Log in

Current-induced breakdown of superconductivity in constricted type I superconducting films

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In simultaneous magneto-optical and electrical measurements on constricted type I superconducting films we have correlated step structure in the currentvoltage characteristic with the nucleation of individual flux-tube trains. A central feature of this experiment is the development of a sample geometry with which we can restrict the breakdown behavior to a single, localized flux-tube train running perpendicular to the transport current. Apparently, the step structure in the I–V characteristic results from a Gibbs free-energy barrier against the nucleation of flux-tube trains. The experiments are performed with films of lead and indium. From the I–V characteristics of the indium constrictions we conclude that the flux-tube nucleation rate can vary substantially with applied current beyond a voltage step at temperatures near T c.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. W. Anderson and A. H. Dayem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. Skocpol, M. R. Beasley, and M. Tinkham, J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 145 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. J. Skocpol, M. R. Beasley, and M. Tinkham, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4045 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Guthmann, J. Maurer, M. Belin, J. Boh, and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. B 11, 1924 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. G. Hayler, L. M. Geppert, J. T. Chen, and Y. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 11, 1924 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kümmel, Phys. Rev. B 10, 2812 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. P. Huebener and D. E. Gallus, Phys. Rev. B 7, 4089 (1973); R. P. Huebener and H. L. Watson, Phys. Rev. B 9, 3725 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. L. Watson, R. T. Kampwirth, and R. P. Huebener, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3634 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. T. Kampwirth and R. P. Huebener, Phys. Lett. 49A, 3 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. Chimenti, H. L. Watson, and R. P. Huebener, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 416 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. E. Chimenti and R. P. Huebener, LT 14 Conference, Helsinki, 1975.

  12. J. M. Mochel, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester (1966), unpublished.

  13. R. P. Huebener, R. T. Kampwirth, and V. A. Rowe, Cryogenics 12, 100 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kirchner, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 4, 531 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. R. Solomon and R. E. Harris, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, Kyoto, Japan, Sep. 4–10, 1970, E. Kanda, ed. (Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo, 1971), pp. 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Clem, R. P. Huebener, and D. E. Gallus, J. Low Temp. Phys. 12, 449 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. P. Huebener and D. E. Gallus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 22, 597 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based on work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chimenti, D.E., Watson, H.L. & Huebener, R.P. Current-induced breakdown of superconductivity in constricted type I superconducting films. J Low Temp Phys 23, 303–318 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116922

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116922

Keywords

Navigation