Summary
Although science can be characterized in terms of search, some search methods let one explore multiple paths in parallel. We have argued that more machine learning researchers should focus their efforts on modeling human behavior, but we have not argued that the field should limit itself to this approach. For those interested in general principles, the study of nonhuman learning methods is also necessary for useful results. In terms of applications, some of machine learning's greatest achievements have involved nonincremental methods that are clearly poor models of human learning. Planes are terrible imitations of birds (and fly less efficiently), but there are still excellent reasons for using aircraft.
However, we do believe that too little research has focused on results from the literature on human learning, and that greater attention in this direction would benefit the field as a whole. Science is a complex and bewildering process, and the scientist should employ all available knowledge to direct his steps in useful directions. This strategy seems especially important in young fields like machine learning, in which conflicting views and methods abound. We encourage the reader to join us in applying machine learning techniques to explain the mysteries of human behavior, and in using knowledge of human behavior to constrain our computational theories of learning.
Article PDF
References
Anzai, Y., & Simon, H.A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140.
Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
Feigenbaum, E.A. (1963). The simulation of verbal learning behavior. In. E.A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hill, J.A.C. (1983). A computational model of language acquisition in the two-year-old. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hunt, E.B., Marin, J., & Stone, P. (1966). Experiments in induction. New York: Academic Press.
Kolodner, J.L. (1983). Maintaining organization in a dynamic long-term memory. Cognitive Science, 7, 243–280.
Laird, J.E., Rosenbloom, P.S., & Newell, A. (1986). SOAR: The anatomy of a general learning mechanism. Machine Learning, 1, 11–46.
Langley, P. (1982). Language acquisition through error recovery. cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 211–255.
Langley, P. (1985). Learning to search: From weak methods to domain-specific heuristics. Cognitive Science, 9, 217–260.
Lebowitz, M. (1982). Correcting erroneous generalizations. Cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 367–381.
Mitchell, T.M., Utgoff, P., & Banerji, R.B. (1983). Learning problem solving heuristics by experimentation. In R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell, & T.M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga.
Newell, A. (1967). Studies in problem solving: Subject 3 on the crypt-arithmetic task Donald+Gerald= Robert (Technical Report). Center for the Study of Information Processing, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ohlsson, S. (1983). A constrained mechanism for procedural learning. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 426–428). Karlsruhe, FRG: Morgan-Kaufmann.
Porter, B.W., & Kibler, D.F. (1986). Experimental goal regression: A method for learning problem solving heuristics. Machine Learning, 1, 249–286.
Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblance studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Selfridge, M. (1981). A computer model of child language acquisition. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 92–96). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Morgan-Kaufmann.
Waterman, D.A. (1970). Generalization learning techniques for automating the learning of heuristics. Artificial Intelligence, 1, 121–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Langley, P. Editorial: Human and machine learning. Mach Learn 1, 243–248 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116892
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116892