Skip to main content
Log in

Sex ratio polymorphism: The impact of mutation and drift on evolution

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the question, which sex ratio will evolve in a population that is subject to mutation and drift. The problem is analyzed using a simulation model as well as analytical methods. A detailed simulation model for the evolution of a population's allele distribution shows that for the sex ratio game a wide spectrum of different population states may evolve from on the one hand a monomorphic state with one predominant allele and with all other alleles suppressed by the forces of selection, to on the other hand a polymorphism determined by recurrent mutations. Which of these states will evolve depends on the population size, the mating system and the rate of mutations. For the sex ratio game the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), as defined by evolutionary game theory, can only predict the population sex ratio but not the underlying stable population state. A comparison of different approaches to the problem shows that false predictions of the stable population states might result from two simplifying assumptions that are fairly common in evolutionary biology:

  1. a)

    it is assumed that mutations are rare events and there is never more than one mutant gene present in a population at any one time;

  2. b)

    a deterministic relationship is assumed between the fitness assigned to an individual's strategy and the individual's contribution to the gene pool of future generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bull, J.J. (1983). Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms.- Menlo Park, California, Benjamin and Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulmer, M.G. (1971). Protein polymorphism.- Nature 234: 410–411.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burger, R.(1988). Mutation-selection balance and continuum-of-allele models.- Math.Biosci. to appear.

  4. Charnov, E.R. (1982). The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crow, J.F. and Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory.- New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eshel, I. and Feldman, M.W. (1982). On evolutionary genetic stability of the sex ratio.- Theor. Popul. Biol. 21: 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer, D.S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.- London, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, R.A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.- Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hadeler, K.P. (1981). Stable polymorphisms in a selection model with mutation.- SIAM J. Appl. Math. 41: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton, W.D. (1967). Extraordinary sex ratios.- Science 156: 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hines, W.G.S. (1987). Evolutionary stable strategies: a review of basic theory.- Theor. Popul. Biol. 31: 195–272.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hofbauer, J. (1985). The selection mutation equation.- J. Math. Biology 23: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser, H. (1985). Simulation in der Oekologie. In G. Weidemann, ed., Verhandl. Ges. kologie XIII (Bremen 1983), 387–401.

  14. Karlin, S. and Lessard, S. (1983). On the optimal sex ratio.- Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 5931–5935.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nisbet, R.M. and Gurney, W.S.C. (1982). Modelling Fluctuating Populations.- Chichester, New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O'Brian, P. (1985). A genetic model with mutation and selection.- Math. biosci. 73: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pianka, E.R. (1974). Evolutionary Ecology.- New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poethke, H.-J. and Kaiser, H. (1985). A simulation approach to evolutionary game theory: the evolution of time sharing behaviour in a dragonfly mating system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schuster, P. and Sigmund, K. (1981). Coyness, philandering and stable strategies.- Anim. Behav. 29: 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw, R.F. (1958). The theoretical genetics of the sex ratio.- Genetics 93: 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sigmund, K. and Hofbauer, J. (1988). Dynamical Systems and the Theory of Evolution.- Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spieth, C.C. (1974). Theoretical considerations of unequal sex ratios.- Am. Nat. 108: 837–849.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, P.D. and Sauer, A. (1980). The selective advantage of sex-ratio homeostasis.- Am. Nat. 116: 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas, B. (1984). Evolutionary stability: states and strategies.- Theor. Popul. Biol. 26: 49.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uyenoyama, M.K. and Bengtsson, B.O. (1979). Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. Genetics 93: 721–736.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uyenoyama, M.K. and Bengtsson, B.O. (1981). Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio: II. Haplodiploid and diploid models with sibling and parental control of the brood sex ratio and brood size.- Theor. Popul. Biol. 20: 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uyenoyama, M.K. and Bengtsson, B.O. (1981). Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio: III. Parental and sibling control of brood investment ratio under partial sib-mating.- Theor. Popul. Biol. 22: 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verner, J. (1965). Selection for sex ratio.- Am. Nat. 99: 419.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wright, S. (1964). Stochastic processes in evolution. In John Gurland, ed., Stochastic Models in Medicine and Biology.- Madison, Univ. of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies.- Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poethke, H.J. Sex ratio polymorphism: The impact of mutation and drift on evolution. Acta Biotheor 37, 121–147 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115900

Keywords

Navigation