Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of sexual reproduction as a repair mechanism. Part I. A model for self-repair and its biological implications

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The theory is presented that the sexual process is a repair mechanism which maintains redundancy within the sub-structure of hierarchical, self-reproducing organisms. In order to keep the problems within mathematically tractable limits (see Part II), a simple model is introduced: a wheel with 6 spokes, 3 of them vital and 3 redundant, symbolizes the individual (cell or organism). Random accidents destroy spokes; the wheels replicate at regular cycles and engage periodically in pairing and repair phases during which missing spokes are copy-reproduced along the intact spokes of the partner wheel.

The hierarchical structure of such a system is analysed and an ‘autonomous unit’ is defined: this is the unit of minimal hierarchical complexity which is capable of perpetuating autonomously all higher and all lower levels of the hierarchy; this is the central unit of selection.

Four basic, physical parameters are isolated which determine the essential features of any eucaryotic life cycle: 1. The number of levels of the hierarchy (unicellular, multicellular, colonial, etc.); 2. the relation between the phases of replication (asexual generations) and repair (sexual generations); 3. the duration of potential repair (haplo- diplo-phases); 4. the position of the sexual partners within the hierarchy (selfing, monecy, dioecy, reproductive individuals within colonies, etc.).

The evaluation of fitness components is considered in relation to trends of reproductive patterns in evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cameron, I. L. & G. M. Padilla ed. (1966). Cell synchrony. - New York and London, Academic Press, 392 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M. & H. H. Pattee (1970). Evolution experiments with an artificial ecosystem. - J. Theoret. Biol. 28, p. 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E. H. et al. (1973). Arrangement and characterization of repetitive sequence elements in animal DNA-s. - Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, p. 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. & S. Wright (1941). Genetics of natural populations vs relations between mutation rate and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudobflura. - Genetics 26, p. 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. (1971). Self-organization of matter and the evolution of macromolecules. - Naturwissenflhaften 58, p. 465–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. & R. Winkler (1975). Das Spiel. - München and Zürich, R. Piper & Co, 404 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. J. (1975). Genetic repair: Introduction by the Chairman. - Genetics 79 Suppl., p. 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, W., N. Maizels & A. Maxam (1975). Sequences of controlling regions of the E. coli lactose operon. - Genetics 79 Suppl., p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1972). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. -In: G. C. Williams ed., Group selection, p. 23–43. - Chicago and New York, Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanawalt, P. C. (1975). Molecular mechanisms involved in DNA repair. - Genetics 79 Suppl., p. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. H. & H. Stern (1971). The appearance of DNA breakage and repair activities in the synchronous meiotic cycle of Lilium. - J. mol. Biol. 55, p. 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. J. jr. & H. O. Smith (1970). A restriction enzyme from Hemophilus influenza. - J. mol. Biol. 51, p. 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni, G. E. & R. C. von Borstel (1962). Different rates of spontaneous mutations during mitosis and meiosis in yeast. -Genetics 47, p. 1097–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1971). The origin and maintenance of sex. - In: G. C. Williams ed., Group selection, p. 163–175. - Chicago and New York, Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W. (1958). Hybrid vigor, heterosis and evolution in Paramecium aurelia. - Evolution 12, p. 402–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W. (1967). Genetics of aging and the life cycle in ciliates. - Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 21, p. 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. A. jr., et al. (1973). Cylodromes and palindromes in chromosomes.-Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, p. 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I. (1972). Biological memory. - Acta biotheor. 21, p. 204–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I. (1976). Maxwell's demon in biological systems. -Acta biotheor. 25, p. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I. & R. M. Williams (1976). The evolution of the cooperative group. - Acta biotheor. 25, p. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. - Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 201 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. & B. Mitton (1973). Why reproduce sexually? - J. theor. Biol. 39, p. 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, I. The evolution of sexual reproduction as a repair mechanism. Part I. A model for self-repair and its biological implications. Acta Biotheor 27, 133–158 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115831

Keywords

Navigation