Skip to main content
Log in

The illusion of fiscal illusion: Unsticking the flypaper effect

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognizing that it is difficult to prove a negative, this paper marshals evidence in support of the hypothesis that the widely documented flypaper effect of federal grants to state and local governments is purely a statistical artifact. A review of previous studies and a monte carlo investigation suggest that the use of an inappropriate functional form may generate an illusory flypaper effect. A local expenditure equation is then estimated in alternative specifications with ten years of state level data. Empirical results confirm the sensitivity of the flypaper effect to specification, and tests of fit unambiguously favor one functional form. That specification yields no statistical evidence of a flypaper effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R.J. (1991). If Moscow would only honor its debts. Wall Street Journal (12 June): A14.

  • Becker, E. and Lindsay, C.M. (1994). Does government free ride? Journal of Law and Economics, 37 (April): 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demand for public goods. American Economic Review 63 (June): 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocherding, T. and Deacon, R.T. (1972). The demand for services of the nonfederal governments. American Economic Review 62 (December): 891–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernick, H. (1979). An economic model of the distribution of project grants. In P.M. Mieszkowski and W.H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W.R. and Kenyon, D.A. (1988). Pressure groups and public expenditures: The flypaper effect reconsidered. Economic Inquiry 26 (January): 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R.G. (1973). The demand for state and local government employees. American Economic Review 63 (June): 366–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R.G. and Smith, R.S. (1988). Modern labor economics, 3rd ed. Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M.S. (1975). Wealth neutrality and local choice in public education. American Economic Review 65 (March): 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimon, R., Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1982). Asymmetric information and agenda control: Bases of monopoly power and public spending. Journal of Public Economics 17 (February): 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.C. (1982). Income and grant effects on local expenditure: The flypaper effect and other difficulties. Journal of Urban Economics 12 (November): 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follain, J.R. (1979). Grant impacts on local fiscal behavior: Full-information maximum likelihood estimates. Public Finance Quarterly 7 (October): 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B.W. (1983). The flypaper effect and other anomalies. Journal of Public Economics 22 (December): 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C. and Collier, P. (1977). Testing for functional misspecification in regression analysis. Journal of Econometrics 6 (July): 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R.G. (1986). Pension wealth and individual saving: Some new evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18 (May): 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R.P. (1971). Towards an econometric model of local budgeting. National Tax Association Papers and Proceedings 699–719.

  • Inman, R.P. (1978). Testing political economy's ‘as if’ proposition: Is the median voter really decisive? Public Choice 33 (Winter): 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R.P. (1979). The fiscal performance of local governments: An interpretative review. In P.M. Mieszkowski and M. Straszheim (Eds.), Current issues in urban economics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N.M. and Choudhury, S.A. (1990). Testing the exogeneity of grants to local governments. Canadian Journal of Economics 23 (August): 676–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.B. (1979). Community income, intergovernmental grants and local school district fiscal behavior. In P.M. Mieszowski and W.H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H.F. (1975). Local education expenditure, fiscal capacity and the composition of property tax base. National Tax Journal 28 (June): 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C.M. and Zycher, B. (1984). Substitution in public spending: Who pays for Canadian National Health Insurance. Economic Inquiry 22 (July): 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. (1991). New evidence on fiscal illusion: The 1986 tax windfalls. American Economic Review 81 (December): 1336–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M.C. (1978). A method for estimating the effect of a subsidy on the receiver's resource constraint: With an application to U.S. local governments, 1964–1971. Journal of Public Economics 10 (August): 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megdal, S.B. (1987). The flypaper effect revisited: An econometric explanation. Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (May): 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. (1986). The econometrics of piece-wise budget constraints. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4 (July): 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. (1979). Lump-sum intergovernmental grants have price effects. In P.M. Mieszkowski and W.H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. (1988). On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: A survey. In G. Brennan (Ed.), Taxation and fiscal federalism: Essays in honor of Russell Matthews. Sydney: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1973). The effect of government subsidies-in-kind on private expenditures: The case of higher education. Journal of Political Economy 81 (January/February): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1975). The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83 (July/August): 677–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. and Miller, R. (1971). Applied econometrics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (1984). A positive model of private charity and public transfers. Journal of Political Economy 92 (February): 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1975). Pitfalls in financial model building: A clarification. American Economic Review 65 (June): 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1957). Specification errors and the estimation of economic relationships. Review of the International Statistical Institute 25: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J.G. (1979). Alternative specification error tests: A comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (March): 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weicher, J.C. (1972). Aid, expenditures and local government structure. National Tax Journal 23 (December): 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). Using least squares to approximate unknown regression functions. International Economic Review 21 (February): 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, P.G. (1991). The elusive flypaper effect. Journal of Urban Economics 30 (November): 310–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zampelli, E.M. (1986). Resource fungibility, the flypaper effect and the expenditure impact of grants-in-aid. Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (February): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, E. The illusion of fiscal illusion: Unsticking the flypaper effect. Public Choice 86, 85–102 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114876

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114876

Keywords

Navigation