REFERENCES
Cohen, L. (1979). Cyclic sets in multidimensional voting models. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 1–12.
Davis, O. A., DeGroot, M. H., and Hinich, M. J. (1972). Social preference orderings and majority rule. Econometrica 40 (Jan.): 147–157.
Denzau, A., Mackay, R., and Weaver, C. (1980). The possibility of majority rule equilibrium with agenda costs. Center for Study of Public Choice working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Revised February 1980.
Matthews, S. A. (1980). Pairwise symmetry conditions for voting equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 9: 141–156.
McKelvey, R. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–482.
McKelvey, R. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica 47: 1085–1111.
McKelvey, R., and Ordeshook, P. (1976). Symmetric spatial games without majority rule equilibria. American Political Science Review 70: 1172–1184.
Plott, C. R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review 57 (Sept.): 787–806.
Shepsle, K. (1979). Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.
Simpson, P. (1969). On defining areas of voter choice: Professor Tullock on stable voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83: 478–490.
Slutsky, S. (1979). Equilibrium under α-majority voting. Econometrica 47 (Sept.): 1113–1125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants SES-8111411 and SOC-7900034.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enelow, J.M., Hinisch, M.J. On Plott's pairwise symmetry condition for majority rule equilibrium. Public Choice 40, 317–321 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114527
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114527