Skip to main content
Log in

Government spending cycles: Ideological or opportunistic?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines whether partisan and opportunistic motives affect government expenditure growth in the Netherlands. The time series analysis, covering the period 1953–1993, allows for different types of government spending. In general, spending is inspired by ideological and opportunistic motives: all government expenditure categories show an upward drift during election times and the ‘partisan’ motives behind government spending are clearly revealed: left-wing cabinets attach greater importance to social security and health care than right-wing cabinets and right-wing cabinets value expenditure on infrastructure and defense more than left-wing parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER macroeconomics annual 1988. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1990). Evaluating rational partisan business cycle theory: A response. Economics and Politics 5: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G.D., and Roubini, N.. (1992). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. In A. Cukierman, Z. Hercowitz, and L. Leiderman (Eds.), Political economy, growth, and business cycles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan politics, divided government and the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. Review of Economic Studies 59: 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E. (1985). The causes of government expenditure growth: A survey of the U.S. evidence. Journal of Public Economics 28: 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E. and Deacon, R.T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review 62: 891–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Planning Bureau (1994). De collectieve uitgaven in de periode 1950–1990: Een onderzoek naar de componenten van de quotestijging. Werkdocument no. 67, The Hague.

  • Daalder, H. and Schuyt, C.J.M. (1991). Compendium voor politiek en samenleving in Nederland. Houten: Bohn Stafleu/Van Loghum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1962). Why the government budget is too small in a democracy. In E.S. Phelps (Ed.), Private wants and public needs: Issues surrounding the size and scope of government expenditure. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978a). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978b). A politico-economic model of the United Kingdom. Economic Journal 88: 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, F., Schneider, F., and Withers, G. (1993). The public sector in Australia: A quantitative analysis. In N. Gemmel (Ed.), The growth of the public sector. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, Gower House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S.E. and Stone, J.A. (1989). An integrated test for electoral cycles in the U.S. economy. Review of Economics and Statistics 426–434.

  • Hibbs, D. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly 14: 322–331, reprinted in: M. Kalecki, 1971, Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, 1933–1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristov, L., Lindert, P., and McClelland, R. (1992). Pressure groups and redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 48: 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1: 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. (1978). The political business cycle: An empirical test. Southern Economic Journal 44: 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1990). Macroeconomic policy, credibility and politics. London: Harwood Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, P.S.A. and Van Winden, F.A.A.M. (1987). On the importance of elections and ideology for government policy in a multi-party system. In M.J. Holler (Ed.), The logic of multi-party systems. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review 80: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. and Sibert, A. (1988). Equilibrium political business cycles. Review of Economic Studies 55: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. and Alesina, A. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review 80: 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Constructive comments by Frans van Winden, Wilko Letterie, Peter Cornelisse, Arie Ros, André de Moor, Harry ter Rele and an anonymous referee are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Dalen, H.P., Swank, O.H. Government spending cycles: Ideological or opportunistic?. Public Choice 89, 183–200 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114285

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114285

Keywords

Navigation