Skip to main content
Log in

Population structure and pattern of geographic variation in Muscari comosum along its range of distribution

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic variation for six loci in 37 populations of Muscari comosum L. (Liliaeeae) is surveyed. One locus is monomorphic and identical in all the populations. The remaining loci are polymorphic. Although the GOT-1 and GOT-3 loci show a pronounced heterozygote deficit explained by selection acting upon these loci (or on genes linked to them), the remaining loci nearly conform to Hardy-Weinberg proportions. The overall pattern shows a low level of heterozygote deficit (FIS=0.08) explained by the mixed mating system. The organization of genetic variation shows a low level of interpopulation differentiation (FST or GST=0.04). At the same time, autocorrelation analysis shows no pattern of geographical variation. It is concluded that gene flow and selection interact to produce the overall pattern of genetic variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf, F. W., 1983. Isolation, gene flow and genetic differentiation among populations. In ‘Genetics and Conservation”, C. M.Schonewald-Cox, S. M.Chambers, B.MacBryde & L.Thomas, Eds. Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Comp. Inc. London, pp. 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., Powell, J. R. & Dobzhansky, T., 1971. Polymorphism in continental and island populations of Drosophila willistoni. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68(10): 2480–2483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. J. & Culver, D. C., 1979. Neighborhood sizes in Viola. Evolution 33(4): 1226–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. D., 1972. Some of the evolutionary consequences of being a plant. Evol. Biol. 5: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. J., 1970. An introduction to isozyme techniques. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. H. D., 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 15: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. H. D., Zohary, D. & Nevo, E., 1978. Outerossing rates and heterozygosity in natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum Koch in Israel. Heredity 41(1): 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan, C. M. & Gliddon, C., 1985. Genetic neighborhood sizes in Primula vulgaris. Heredity 54: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caugant, D., Selander, R. K. & Jones, J. S., 1982. Geographic structuring of molecular and morphological polymorphism in Pyrenean populations of the snail Cepaea nemoralis. Genetica 57: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesser, R. K., 1983. Genetic variability within and among populations of the black-tailed praire dog. Evolution 37(2): 320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, M. T., 1980. Measuring plant mating systems. Bioscience 30(12): 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancik, B. F. & Yeh, F. C., 1983. Allozyme variability and evolution of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and jack pine (P. banksiana) in Alberta. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 25: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R. & Sokal, R. R., 1969. A new statistical approach to geographical variation analysis. Syst. Zool. 18: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, D.E. & Barret, C. H., 1987. Genetic variation in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity 59: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guries, R. P. & Ledig, F. T., 1982. Genetic diversity and population structure in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution 36(2): 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., 1982. Plant population genetics and evolution. Amer. J. Bot. 69(10): 1689–1693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., 1983. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. In: ‘Genetics and Conservation’, C. M.Schonewald-Cox, S. M.Chambers, B.Mac-Bryde & L.Thomas, Eds. Benjamin/Cummings London, pp. 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., Linhart, Y. B. & Mitton, J. B., 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 10: 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, P. D. N. & Payne, W. J., 1985. Genetic variation in populations of the hermaphroditic flatworm Mesostoma lingua (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela). Biol. Bull. 169: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, R. D. & Hamrick, J. L., 1983. Patterns and levels of genetic variation in great basin bristlecone pine, Pinus longaeva. Evolution 37(2): 302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. S., Selander, R. K. & Schnell, G. D., 1980. Patterns of morphological and molecular polymorphism in the land snail Cepaca nemoralis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. London 14: 359–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecie, M. L. & Tucic, N., 1984. Genic diversity and population genetic structure of Triturus vulgaris (Urodela, Salamandridae). Evolution 38(2): 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. E. & Waller, D. M., 1987. Genetic consequences of outcrossing in the cleistogamous annual, Impatiens capensis. I. Population-genetic structure. Evolution 41(5): 969–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, C. R. & Ganders, F. R., 1984. The genetic consequences of contrasting breeding systems in Plectritis (Valerianaceae). Evolution 38(6): 1308–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1977. The organization of genetic variability in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 31: 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1978. Genetic variation in annual Phlox: self-compatible versus self-incompatible species. Evolution 32(2): 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1981. Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar. 68(2): 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A. & Kerster, H. W., 1974. Gene flow in seed plants. Evol. Biol. 7: 131–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., Ritter, K. & Ellstrand, N. C., 1979. Protein polymorphism in the narrow endemic Oenothera organensis. Evolution 33(2): 534–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, pp. 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Alonso, D., 1985. Estructura genética de poblaciones naturales de Muscari comosum. Ph.T. Universidad de Granada.

  • López Alonso, D., 1987. Program in BASIC for computing unbiased F-statistics. J. Heredity 78(5): 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Alonso, D. & Ruíz Rejón, M., 1986. Outerossing rate in Muscari comosum. Isozyme Bull. 19: 44.

  • Mitton, J. B., Linhart, Y. B., Hamrick, J. L. & Beckman, J. S., 1977. Observations on the genetics structure and mating system of Ponderosa pine in the Colorado Front Range. Theor. appl. Genet. 51: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, J. B., Sturgeon, K. B. & Davis, M. L., 1980. Genetic differentiation in ponderosa pine along a steep elevational transect. Silvae Genetica 29: 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, J., Broussier, G. & Jayle, M. F., 1957. Réalisation technique et premières applications de l'électrophorèse sur gel d'amidon. Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol. 39: 593–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70(12): 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. North-Holland Publ. Comp. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. & Chesser, R. K., 1983. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann. Hum. Genet. 47: 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C. M., Fobes, J. F. & Holle, M., 1977. Genetic variation in Lycopersicum pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating system. Plant. Syst. Evol. 127: 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royaltey, H. H., Astrachan, E. & Sokal, R. R., 1975. Test for patterns in geographic variation. Geogr. Anal. 7: 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B. A., 1975. Population structure and local differentiation in Liatris cylindracea. Am. Nat. 109: 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B. A. & Smith, W. G., 1980. The apportionment of genetic variation within and among populations of Desmodium nudiflorum. Evolution 34(2): 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, S. W., KellerJr., E. C. & Buroker, N. E., 1985. Population genetics of Melampus bidentatus (Gastropoda: Pulmonata): the effect of planktonic development on gene flow. Genetica 66: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, D. J., 1982, The breeding system of Gillia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outerossing rate. Evolution 36(2): 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaegerle, K. E. & Schaal, B. A., 1979. Genetic variability and founder effect in the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea L, Evolution 32(4): 1210–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K. & Kauffman, D. W., 1975. Genetic structure of populations of the brown snail (Helix sitehensis). I. Microgeographic variation. Evolution 29: 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. Y., Johnson, W. E. & Gentry, J. B., 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (P. polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. Univ. Texas Publ. 7103: 49–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & Menozzi, R., 1982. Spatial autocorrelations of Hla frequencies in Europe support demic diffusion of early farmers. Am. Nat. 119: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & Oden, N. L., 1978a. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. I. Methodology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. London 10: 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & Oden, N. L., 1978b. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 2. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. London 10: 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. E., Stephens, J. C. & Anderson, W. W., 1982. Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79: 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M., 1987. Spatial genetic heterogeneity in a population of the montane perennial plant Delphinium nelsonii. Heredity 58: 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J. F. & Parks, C. R., 1985. Genetic diversity and population structure in Camellia japonica L. (Theaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72(1): 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P. L. & Niswander, J. D., 1970. Population studies on southwestern indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22: 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. IV. Variability within and among natural populations. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, F. C. & El-Kassaby, Y. A., 1980. Enzyme variation in natural populations of sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). I. Genetic variation patterns among trees from 10 IUFRO provenances. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, F. C. & Layton, C., 1979. The organization of genetic variability in central marginal populations of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21(4): 487–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, F. C. & O'Malley, D., 1980. Enzyme variation in natural populations of douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco from British Columbia. Genetic variation pattern in coastal populations. Silvae Genetica 29: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonso, D.f., Reguera, L.P. Population structure and pattern of geographic variation in Muscari comosum along its range of distribution. Genetica 78, 39–49 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058673

Keywords

Navigation