Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence of a new violation of the independence axiom

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past 40 years there has been an accumulation of experimental evidence suggesting that most of the axioms of expected utility theory are liable to be systematically violated by substantial numbers of individuals. Much of this evidence has focused on failures of the independence axiom and has stimulated a number of alternative models that try to explain that evidence in various ways. This article presents a fresh experiment that looks at a different kind of violation—one that does not appear to be easily accommodated by several of the more prominent alternative models as they are currently formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, D. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty,”Operations Research 30, 961–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1988).Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G. (1988). “Different Experimental Procedures for Obtaining Valuations of Risky Actions: Implications for Utility Theory,”Theory and Decision 25, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., and R. Sugden (1982). “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty,”Economic Journal 92, 805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., and R. Sugden (1987). “Some Implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory,”Journal of Economic Theory 41, 270–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. (1982). “‘Expected Utility’ Theory Without the Independence Axiom,”Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. (1987). “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1987). “The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach,”International Economic Review 28, 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1987). “Equity and Coalition Bargaining in Experimental Three-Person Games.” In A. E. Roth (ed),Laboratory Experimentation in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman (1986). “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions,”Journal of Business 4, S251-S278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The experimental work reported in this article was funded by Economic and Social Research Council Award No. B 00 23 2163.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loomes, G. Evidence of a new violation of the independence axiom. J Risk Uncertainty 4, 91–108 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057888

Key words

Navigation