Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case consultation: The committee or the clinical consultant?

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. LaPuma, J. and Toulmin, C. Ethics Consultants and Ethics Committees. Arehives of Internal Medicine, 1989; 149(5): 1109–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lo, B. Behind Closed Doors: Promises and Pitfalls of Ethics Committees. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987; 317(1): 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lasch C. The Culture of Narcissism. W.W. Norton & Co., Warner Books Edition, 1979; p. 385.

  4. Veatch, R. Clinical Ethics, Applied Ethics, and Ethical Theory, in Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice. Hoffmaster, B, Freedman, B, Fraser, G, (eds.), Humana Press, Clifton, N.J., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brody, H. Applied Ethics: Don't Change the Subject, in Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice. Hoffmaster, B, Freedman, B, Fraser, G, (eds.), Humana Press, Clifton, N.J., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Judith Wilson Ross M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, J.W. Case consultation: The committee or the clinical consultant?. HEC Forum 2, 289–298 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057828

Keywords

Search

Navigation