Skip to main content
Log in

Phenetic distances in the Drosophila melanogaster-subgroup species and oviposition-site preference for food components

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oviposition-site preferences (O.S.P.) have been investigated in females of six sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. O.S.P. were determined for standard food components and yeast genotypes. Females of all species showed a strong preference for complete medium and avoidance of pure agar as an egg-deposition site.

Ecological trees of the species on the basis of rank correlations were constructed. In ‘no-choice’ situations they agree with phylogenetic trees obtained by different means but in ‘choice’ situations they do not agree too well.

All species showed a high egg production on live yeast compared with standard medium (with killed yeast) and D. erecta females demonstrated discrimination between yeast genotypes. Niche breadth calculated from survival on the sterol mutant yeasts correlated fairly well with phylogenetic trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. M. M. & ElHelw, M. R., 1974. Differences in the yeasts preferred by Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 3: 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., Tracey, M., Hedgcock, D., & Richmond, R. C., 1975. Genetic differentiation within the melanogaster species group of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). Evolution 28: 576–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardmore, J. A., VanDelden, W. & Alkema, L., 1963. A population cage for incubator use. D.I.S. 37: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., 1973. Preliminary observations on the yeasts associated with Drosophila obscura and D. subobscura. D.I.S. 50: 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M., Burnet, B., Farrow, R. & Woods, R. A., 1976. Development of Drosophila on sterol mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res., Camb. 28: 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M. & Scharloo, W., 1973. The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mean values and variances. Genetics 75: 679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H. L., 1971. Speciation and the founder principle. Stadler Symp. 3: 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Camfield, R. G., Galvin, A. M. & Pitts, C. R., 1979. Environmental factors affecting the quantity of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 280: 517–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaCunha, A. B., 1951. Modification of the adaptive values of chromosomal types in Drosophila pseudoobscura by nutritional variables. Evolution 5: 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. & Tsacas, L., 1975. Les Drosophilidae(Diptera) de l'Ile de la Réunion et d'Ile Maurice III Biologie et origine des espèces. Beitr. Ent. 25: 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., 1956. What is an adaptive trait? Am. Nat. 90: 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisses, K. T., VanDijk, H. & VanDelden, W., 1979. Genetic differences within the melanogaster species group of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). Evolution 33: 1063–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heed, W. B. & Kircher, H. W., 1965. Unique sterol in the ecology and nutrition of Drosophila pachea. Science 149: 758–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaise, D. & Tsacas, L., 1974. Les Drosophilidae des savanes pré-forestières de la région tropicale de Lamto (Côte d'Ivoire). II. Le peuplement des fruits de Pandanus candelabrum (Pandanacées). Ann. Univ. Abidjan E. 7: 153–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemeunier, F. & Ashburner, H., 1976. Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 193: 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. F. & Ayala, F. J., 1974. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature 250: 572–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. A. & Parsons, P. A., 1972. Alcohol tolerance: an ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Oecologia 10: 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. R., 1971. Genetic polymorphisms in a varied environment. Science 174: 1035–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco, Freeman and Cy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M., 1972. Disruptive selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 182: 109–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsacas, L. & David, J., 1974. Drosophila mauritiana n.sp. du groupe melanogaster de l'Ile Maurice (Dipt.: Drosophilidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 79: 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsacas, L. & Lachaise, D., 1974. Quatre nouvelles espèces de la Côte d'lvoire du genre Drosophila, groupe melanogaster et discussion de l'origine du sous-groupe melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Univ. Abidjan E. 7: 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bos, M., Boerema, A. Phenetic distances in the Drosophila melanogaster-subgroup species and oviposition-site preference for food components. Genetica 56, 175–183 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057557

Keywords

Navigation