Skip to main content
Log in

Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity has not only focused attention on the concept of biodiversity it has also set expectations that the signatory nations will establish objectives. It is suggested here that the use of biodiversity standards could have a useful role in quantifying these objectives. The use of biodiversity standards is explored in connection with the levels of biodiversity In plantation forests. Forest plantations have been used for the basis of this investigation because such plantations could be used as large-scale experiments in which the use of standards, and the ecological monitoring of these standards, could be researched. The impact of intensive forestry practices on wildlife has often been the cause of concern and indeed controversy. Recently there has been a move towards the development of multipurpose forest plantations where management for recreation and wildlife takes place alongside management for timber. Some forest authorities are actively looking at ways of restoring levels of biodiversity in plantation forests. We suggest that if levels of biodiversity are to be restored, then forest managers must have something to aim for; that is, there must be a standard. The adoption of standards could provide a means whereby forest managers can meet biodiversity objectives. Standards may also enable managers to determine the effectiveness of those management practices which are intended to increase levels of biodiversity. We suggest a conceptual plan which combines a monitoring procedure with biodiversity objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammer, U. (1991) Implications of the results of research on dead woody material for the forestry practice. Forstwissen. Centralblatt 110, 149–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, U. and Utisck, H. (1988) Zur Okologischen Wertanalyse im Wald (Ecological value analysis in woodland). Schriftenreihe Bayer. Heft 84. Munchen: Landesamt fur Umweltshultz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1992) Biodiversity. Forest Research News, August 1992.

  • Avery, M. and Leslie, R. (1990) Birds and Forestry. London: Poyser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevege, D.I. (1974) Pine plantations: farm or forest? Proc. 7th. Trienniel conf. pp. 435–43 IFA, Calundra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, F.L., Daust, D.K., Klenner, W., Kremsater, L.L. and McCann, R.K. (1991) Managing for Biodiversity in Forested Ecosystems. Publication M-1, Centre for Applied Conservation Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris-Kaan, R. (1991) Edge management in woodlands. Proceedings of a Symposium held at Alice Holt Lodge. 17th Oct. 1989. Forestry Commission Publication.

  • Ferris-Kaan, R. and Patterson, G.S. (1992) Monitoring Vegetation Changes in Conservation Management of Forests. Forestry Commission Bull. 108. London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (1985). The Policv for Broadleaved Woodlands, Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (1989) Forest Landscape Design: guidelines. Forestry Commission Publication. HMSO.

  • Forestry Commission (1990) Forest Nature Conservation: guidelines. Forestry Commission Publication. HMSO.

  • Forestry Commission (1991) Forests and Water: guidelines. Forestry Commission Publication, HMSO.

  • Hansen, A.J., Spies, T.A., Swanson, F.J. and Ohmann, J.L. (1991) Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41, 382–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (1990) Wildlife, forest and forestry: principles of managing for biological diversity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949) A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D.H. (1980) The management of Forest Streams. Forestry Commission leaflet No. 78. HMSO: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S.G. (1992) Forests in the temperate-boreal transition-natural and man-made features. In Ecological Principles in Nature Conservation. (L. Hansson. ed.) pp. 373–93. London: Elsevier Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4. 355–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, M.A. and Noss, R.F. (1992) Private land management for biodiversity conservation. Environ. Manag. 16, 435–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G.F. (1987) Natural features in the management of upland conifer forests. Proc. R. Soc Edin. 93B, 223–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G.F., Ausherman, D., Buchenau, M. and Forman, T.T. (1992) Old-growth conservation within British upland conifer plantations. Forestry 65. 127–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, C.P. and White, I.M.S. (1993) Revised Windiness Scores for the Windthrow Hazard Classification: the revised scoring method. Research Information Note 230. Farnham: Forest Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, P.R. and Petty, S.J. (1986) The management of commercial forests for wildlife. In Trees and Wildlife in the Scottish Uplands. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Symp. 17. (D. Jenkins, ed.). Institute of Terrestrial Ecology: Banchory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riekerk, H. (1991) Best Management Practices for Upland and Wetland Forests. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. University of Florida. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. FRC 8: Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedell, J.R., Steedman, R.J., Regier, H.A. and Gregory, S.V. (1991) Restoration of human impacted land-water ecotones. In Ecotones: the role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments (M.M. Holland, P.G. Risser and R.J. Naiman, eds.) London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of American Foresters (1992) Biological diversity in forest ecosystems. J. Forestry (US) 90, 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I.F. (1991) Monitoring Ecological Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I.F. and Sawyer, J.W.D. (1993) Biodiversity in plantation forests: increasing levels and maintaining standards. Unpublished report to the Forestry Authority. United Kingdom.

  • Thomas, J.W. (1979) Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests in the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. Technical Edition, Agriculture Handbook, 553. Washington DC: USDA Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utschick, H. (1991) Relations between abundance of dead woody material and bird populations in commercial forests. Forstwissen. Centralblatt 110, 135–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherley, N.S., Lloyd, E.C., Rundle, S.D. and Ormerod, S.J. (1993) Management of conifer plantations for the conservation of stream macroinvertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 63, 171–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.L. and Marcot, B.G. (1991) Use of biodiversity indicators for analysing and managing forest landscapes. Transactions of the 56th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spellerberg, I.F., Sawyer, J.W.D. Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations. Biodivers Conserv 5, 447–459 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056390

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056390

Keywords

Navigation