Skip to main content
Log in

Overcompensation as a mechanism for maintaining polymorphism: egg-to-adult viability in Drosophila

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequency-dependent selection may be accounted for, in ecological terms, by the differential effectiveness of alternative genotypes in exploiting limiting environmental resources. Differentiation in resource exploitation among genotypes implies in turn that a mix of genotypes may exploit more fully the resources than a genetically uniform population, a phenomenon called ‘overcompensation’ Experiments designed to test for overcompensation whow that highly polymorphic populations can support larger numbers of individuals per food unit than less polymorphic populations. This difference cannot be attributed to the level of individual heterozygosity, which is the same in both types of populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F. J., 1968. Genotype, environment, and population numbers. Science 162: 1453–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., 1971. Competition between species: Frequency dependence. Science 171: 820–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., 1972. Competition between species. Amer. Scientist 60: 348–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J. & Campbell, C. A., 1974. Frequency-dependent selection. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. C. & Partridge, L. (eds), 1988. Frequency-Dependent Selection. The Royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York.

  • Kojima, K., 1971. Is there a constant fitness value for a given genotype? No! Evolution 25: 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H., Pavlovsky, O. & Dobzhansky, Th., 1954. Interaction of the adaptive values in polymorphic experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 8: 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., 1965. Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. V. Optimal genetic systems. Genetics 52: 891–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T.-X., Moya, A. & Ayala, F. J., 1990. Two modes of balancing selection in Drosophila melanogaster: Overcompensation and overdominance (submitted).

  • Petit, C., 1951. Le rôle de l'isolement sexuel dans l'évolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg. 85: 392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tošić, M. & Ayala, F. J., 1980. ‘Overcompensation’ at an enzyme locus in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet. Res. Camb. 36: 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milosevié, M., Moya, A. & Ayala, F.J. Overcompensation as a mechanism for maintaining polymorphism: egg-to-adult viability in Drosophila . Genetica 82, 183–187 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056361

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056361

Keywords

Navigation