Abstract
The present article shows how Bayesians should shift beliefs among a family of models concerning the probability distribution of daily changes in the Standard & Poor 500 Index, given a particular sample. The preceding article in this issue showed that classical (R.A. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson) inference can be highly misleading for Bayesians, as can the assumption of a diffuse prior. The present article discusses how to bound Bayesian shifts in belief for compound hypotheses generally, as well as the specific shifts in beliefs among simple and compound hypotheses implied by the particular sample.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, Hirotugu. (1974). “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AO-19, 716–723.
Akaike, Hirotugu. (1977). “Entropy Maximization Principle,”Applications of Statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Akaike, Hirotugu. (1979). “A Bayesian Extension of the Minimum AIC Procedure of Autoregressive Model Fitting,”Biometrika 66, 237–242.
Berger, James. (1985).Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Springer-Verlag.
DeGroot, Morris. (1970).Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Edwards, Ward, Harold Lindman, and Leonard Savage. (1963). “Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research,”Psychological Review 70.
Elderton, William, and Norman, Johnson. (1969).Systems of Frequency Curves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fama, Eugene. (1963). “Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis,”Journal of Business 36, 420–429.
Feller, W. (1971).An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hildreth, Clifford. (1963). “Bayesian Statisticians and Remote Clients,”Econometrica 31, 422–438.
Hoaglin, David, Frederick, Mosteller, and John, Tukey, eds. (1983).Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hoaglin, David, Frederick, Mosteller, and John, Tukey. (1985).Exploring Data Tables Trends and Shapes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Johnson, Norman, E.Nixon, and D.Amos (1963). “Table of Percentage Points of Pearson Curves, For Given 247–1 and 247–2 Expressed in Standard Measure,”Biometrika 50, 459–498.
Kim, Gew-Rae, Harry Markowitz, and Nilufer Usmen. (1988). “The Likelihood of Various Stock Market Hypotheses: Student Distributions with Low Degrees of Freedom.” Baruch College Working Paper Series No. 88-11, Economics and Finance.
Kon, Stanley. (1984). “Models of Stock Returns—A Comparison,”Journal of Finance 39, 147–165.
Mandelbrot, Benoit. (1963). “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices,”Journal of Business 36, 394–419.
Markowitz, Harry, and Nilufer, Usmen. (1996). “The Likelihood of Various Stock Market Return Distributions, Part 1: Principles of Inference,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13, 207–219.
Rubinstein, Mark. (1994). “Implied Binomial Trees,”The Journal of Finance 69, 771–818.
Savage, Leonard. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; (1972), Dover.
Schwarz, Gideon. (1978). “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,”The Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.
Stuart, A., and K.Ord. (1994).Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Distribution Theory, Vol. 1. 6th ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Tukey, John. (1960). “A Survey of Sampling from Contaminated Distributions,”Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press.
Tukey, John. (1962). “The Future of Data Analysis,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics.
Zellner, Arnold. (1971).An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Rutgers University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markowitz, H.M., Usmen, N. The likelihood of various stock market return distributions, part 2: Empirical results. J Risk Uncertainty 13, 221–247 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056154
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056154