Skip to main content
Log in

The likelihood of various stock market return distributions, part 2: Empirical results

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article shows how Bayesians should shift beliefs among a family of models concerning the probability distribution of daily changes in the Standard & Poor 500 Index, given a particular sample. The preceding article in this issue showed that classical (R.A. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson) inference can be highly misleading for Bayesians, as can the assumption of a diffuse prior. The present article discusses how to bound Bayesian shifts in belief for compound hypotheses generally, as well as the specific shifts in beliefs among simple and compound hypotheses implied by the particular sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, Hirotugu. (1974). “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AO-19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, Hirotugu. (1977). “Entropy Maximization Principle,”Applications of Statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, Hirotugu. (1979). “A Bayesian Extension of the Minimum AIC Procedure of Autoregressive Model Fitting,”Biometrika 66, 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, James. (1985).Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, Morris. (1970).Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Ward, Harold Lindman, and Leonard Savage. (1963). “Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research,”Psychological Review 70.

  • Elderton, William, and Norman, Johnson. (1969).Systems of Frequency Curves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene. (1963). “Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis,”Journal of Business 36, 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W. (1971).An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, Clifford. (1963). “Bayesian Statisticians and Remote Clients,”Econometrica 31, 422–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin, David, Frederick, Mosteller, and John, Tukey, eds. (1983).Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin, David, Frederick, Mosteller, and John, Tukey. (1985).Exploring Data Tables Trends and Shapes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Norman, E.Nixon, and D.Amos (1963). “Table of Percentage Points of Pearson Curves, For Given 247–1 and 247–2 Expressed in Standard Measure,”Biometrika 50, 459–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Gew-Rae, Harry Markowitz, and Nilufer Usmen. (1988). “The Likelihood of Various Stock Market Hypotheses: Student Distributions with Low Degrees of Freedom.” Baruch College Working Paper Series No. 88-11, Economics and Finance.

  • Kon, Stanley. (1984). “Models of Stock Returns—A Comparison,”Journal of Finance 39, 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, Benoit. (1963). “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices,”Journal of Business 36, 394–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Harry, and Nilufer, Usmen. (1996). “The Likelihood of Various Stock Market Return Distributions, Part 1: Principles of Inference,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Mark. (1994). “Implied Binomial Trees,”The Journal of Finance 69, 771–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; (1972), Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Gideon. (1978). “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,”The Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A., and K.Ord. (1994).Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Distribution Theory, Vol. 1. 6th ed. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, John. (1960). “A Survey of Sampling from Contaminated Distributions,”Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press.

  • Tukey, John. (1962). “The Future of Data Analysis,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics.

  • Zellner, Arnold. (1971).An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rutgers University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markowitz, H.M., Usmen, N. The likelihood of various stock market return distributions, part 2: Empirical results. J Risk Uncertainty 13, 221–247 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056154

Key words

JEL Classification

Navigation