Abstract
This article examines the actual events of the Bhopal gas disaster as a prelude to considering the social treatment of catastrophic risks of this variety. In the context of the conference, Bhopal is held out to be symbolic of man-made catastrophes having sudden impact and is therefore the contrasting episode to an examination of the symbolic episode for gradual man-made catastrophes, asbestos liability. Bhopal is then connected to the circumstances which created a shortage of commercial catastrophe liability insurance in the 1980s. Its influence on the restructuring of the market is then discussed. A commentary on the buying habits of large industrial corporations is also included.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACE Limited. (1993). “Annual Report.”
Clements, R., and R. Mendoza. (1994). “Risk is not a Four-Letter Word.”Viewpoint (Marsh & McLennan Companies Quarterly). Spring.
Kalelkar. A.S. (1988). “Investigation of Large-Magnitude Incidents: Bhopal as a Case Study.” Report presented at The Institution of Chemical Engineers Conference on Preventing Major Chemical Accidents. May.
Redmond, R.J. (1992). “Stabilizing the Excess Liability Environment: How Scarcity was Turned into Capacity.”Viewpoint (Marsh & McLennan Companies Quarterly), Fall.
Sinfield, N. (1994). “Asbestos—Human or Natural Disaster? Paper prepared for Conference on Social Treatment of Catastrophic Risk, Stanford University. October.
Union Carbide Corporation. (1985). “Bhopal Methyl Isocyanate Incident Investigation Team Report.” Danbury. CT March.
Union Carbide Corporation. (1984). “Annual Report.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, M.J. Union carbide's Bhopal incident: A retrospective. J Risk Uncertainty 12, 257–269 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055797