International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 129–147 | Cite as

The development of an accurate model for the fatigue assessment of doubly curved cracks in tubular joints

  • D. Bowness
  • M. M. K. Lee
Article

Abstract

Fatigue tests on tubular joints have shown that as a crack propagates through the chord wall, it curves under the weld toe. This produces, at the brace-chord intersection, a doubly curved semi-elliptical crack emanating from the weld toe. A doubly curved crack in a tubular joint is a very complex geometry which has proved to be difficult to model. In consequence, previous work on the evaluation of stress intensity factors in tubular joints adopted a simplified approach, ignoring the crack curvature under the weld toe. However, in the absence of benchmark solutions, the effects of any modelling approximation on accuracy are impossible to quantify. To address this problem and as part of the research on fatigue assessment methodologies, a technique which is able to accurately model doubly curved cracks in tubularT-joints has been developed at University of Wales, Swansea. This paper describes a detailed account of the generation of the finite element model and the procedure for evaluating the stress intensity factor solutions. The validation results are also presented to demonstrate the reliability of the model developed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O.D. Dijkstra, inProceedings of the 17th Offshore Technology Conference, Texas, USA (1985) OTC 4866 229–235.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    PD 6493,Guidance on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures, British Standards Institution (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C.Newman and J.S.Raju,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 15, Nos. 1–2 (1981) 185–192Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Bowness and M.M.K. Lee,Journal of Strain Analysis 30, No. 2 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.D. Thurlbeck, Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.D. Thurlbeck and F.M. Burdekin, inProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Calgary, Canada (1992) 285–298.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O.D. Dijkstra, H.H. Snijder and I.J. van Straalen, inProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, The Hague (1989) 137–143.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Fu, J.V. Haswell and P. Bettess, inProceedings of the International Conference on Shallow Crack Fracture Mechanics, Toughness Tests and Applications, The Welding Institute (1992) Paper 22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B.Fu, J.V.Haswell and P.Bettess,International Journal of Fracture 63 (1993) 155–171.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Haswell, inProceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Integrity of Offshore Structures, Glasgow (1990).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Haswell, inProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Calgary, Canada (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Bowness, M.Sc. thesis, University of Wales, Swansea, C/M/277/92 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    PRETUBE User's Manual, Veritas Sesam Systems (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.C. Rhee, S. Han and G.S. Gipson, inProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (1991) 441–452.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ABACRACK User Manual, AEA Technology, Risley, Warrington, UK (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ABAQUS User Manual (version 5.2), Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., USA (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.C.Rhee and M.M.Salama,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 28, No. 2 (1987) 203–209.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Ritchie, C.W.M. Voermans and K. Vollan, inProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fracture Mechanics (1986).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N.O. Kristiansen and B. Fu, inProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Glasgow, UK (1993) 795–801.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.C. Rhee, inEngineering Fracture Mechanics 32 No. 5 (1989) 723–730.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I.S. Raju and J.C. Newman, inEngineering Fracture Mechanics 11 (1979) 817–829.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.C. Newman and I.S. Raju, Analyses of Surface Cracks in Finite Plates Under Tension or Bending Loads, NASA Technical Paper 1578 (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.C. Newman, Private communication (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Efthymiou and S. Durkin, inProceedings of the Conference on the Behaviour of Offshore Steel Structures, Delft (1985) 429–440.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Efthymiou, inProceedings of the Conference on Recent Developments in Tubular Joints Technology, (1988) 2-1–2-33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Bowness
    • 1
  • M. M. K. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of WalesSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations