Skip to main content
Log in

Decision analysis using lottery-dependent utility

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we show how the lottery-dependent expected utility (LDEU) model can be used in decision analysis. The LDEU model is an extension of the classical expected utility (EU) model and yet permits preference patterns that are infeasible in the EU model. We propose a framework for constructing decision trees in a particular way that permits us to use the principle of optimality and thus the divide and conquer strategy for analyzing complex problems using the LDEU model. Our approach may be applicable to some other nonlinear utility models as well. The result is that, if desired, decision analysis can be conducted without assuming the restrictive substitution principle/independence axiom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BeckerJ.L. and R.K.Sarin. (1987). “Lottery Dependent Utility,” Management Science, 11, 1367–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChewS.H. and K.R.MacCrimmon. (1979), “Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory,” University of British Columbia, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, Vancouver, working paper no. 669.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChewS.H. (1983). “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox,” Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory, forthcoming.

  • KahnemanD. and A.Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • LavalleI.H., and K.R.Wapman. (1986). “Rolling Back Decision Trees Requires the Independence Axiom,” Management Science 32, 382–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. (1988). “Rank-Dependent, Subjective Expected Utility Representations,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, forthcoming.

  • LuceR.D., and L.Narens. (1985). “Classification of Concatenation Measurement Structures According to Scale Type,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • MachinaM.J. (1982). “Expected Utility' Analysis without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • vonNeumannJ., and O.Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994; 2nd edition, 1947; 3rd edition, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The support for this research was provided by a grant from the Decision and Management Science program of the National Science Foundation.

The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, J.L., Sarin, R.K. Decision analysis using lottery-dependent utility. J Risk Uncertainty 2, 105–117 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055712

Key words

Navigation