Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of progeny of Coleus blumei following an in vitro selection for salt tolerance

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An in vitro selection method was developed for Coleus blumei to enhance salt tolerance of this amenity species. Leaf disc explants were incubated on a Murashige & Skoog medium containing benzylaminopurine, 2 mg l-1, and napthalene acetic acid, 1 mg l-1, which initiated both callus and plantlets from the explants. A large number of explants were incubated on this differentiating medium containing 90 mM NaCl, which inhibited over 90% of plantlet formation. Surviving plantlets. were grown to maturity, when apical cuttings were taken and propagated. Plants were also allowed to flower and set seed. Cuttings from the selected regenerated plants showed consistently better growth in the presence of NaCl than unselected cuttings. Seed progeny of selected plants also showed more vigorous growth in the presence and absence of NaCl than progeny from unselected plants. The in vitro selection was compared with the results of an earlier in vivo selection to assess the contribution from tissue culture derived somaclonal variation. Progeny from the in vitro selection showed a higher level of tolerance than progeny from the in vivo selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Larkin PJ & Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karp A & Bright SWJ (1985) On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation. In: Miflin BJ (Ed) Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Vol 2 (pp 199–234). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wenzel (1985) Strategies in unconventional breeding for disease resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 23: 149–172

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daub ME (1986) Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 24: 159–186

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banks-Izen MS & Polito US (1980) Changes in ploidy level in callus derived from two growth phases of Hedera helix L. the English Ivy. Plant Sci. Lett. 18: 161–167

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lorz H & Scowcroft WR (1983) Variability amongst plants and their progeny regenerated from protoplasts of Su/su heterozygotes of Nicotiana tabacum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 66: 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collin HA & Dix PJ (1990) Culture systems and selection procedures. In: Dix PJ (Ed) Plant Cell Line Selection. Procedures and Applications (pp 3–18). VCH, Weinham, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nabors MW, Gibbs SE, Bernstein CS & Meis ME (1980) NaCl-tolerant tobacco plants from cultured cells. Zeitschrift Pflanzenphysiol. 97: 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhaskaran S, Smith RH & Schertz KF (1986) Progeny screening of Sorghum plants regenerated from sodium chloride selected callus for salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 122: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCoy TJ (1987) Characterization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants regenerated from selected NaCl tolerant cell lines. Plant Cell Rep. 6: 417–422

    Google Scholar 

  11. McHugen A (1987) Salt tolerance through increased vigour in a flax line (STS-II) selected for salt tolerance in vitro. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 722–732

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vajrabhaya M, Tharapaisol T & Vajrabhaya T (1989) Development of salt tolerant lines of KDML and LPT rice cultivars through tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merrick MMA & Collins HA (1982) Asulam resistance in embryoids of celery tissue cultures. New Phyt. 92: 435–439

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francois LE (1982) Salt tolerance of eight ornamental tree species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 20: 1102–1104

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sonneveld C & Voogt W (1983) Studies on the salt tolerance of some flower crops grown under glass. Plant and Soil 74: 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoagland DR & Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method of growing plants without soil. University of California, Berkeley College of Agriculture, Circular No. 347

  18. Razzaque A & Ellis BE (1977) Rosmarinic acid production in Coleus cultures. Planta 137: 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Plant cell cultures. I Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soyabean root cells. Expt. Cell Res. 50: 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Abta S & Collin HA (1978) Cell differentiation in embryoids and plantlets of celery tissue cultures. New Phyt. 80: 517–521

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nabors MW (1990) Environmental stress resistance. In: Dix PJ (Ed) Plant Cell Line Selection: Procedures and Applications (pp 167–180). VCH Weinhem, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibrahim KM, Collins JC & Collin HA (1991) In vivo selection for salt tolerance in Coleus blumei. J. Hort. Sci. (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, K.M., Collins, J.C. & Collin, H.A. Characterization of progeny of Coleus blumei following an in vitro selection for salt tolerance. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 28, 139–145 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055508

Key words

Navigation