Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 20, Issue 1–2, pp 59–86 | Cite as

The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock

  • P. R. Bird
  • D. Bicknell
  • P. A. Bulman
  • S. J. A. Burke
  • J. F. Leys
  • J. N. Parker
  • F. J. Van Der Sommen
  • P. Voller
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to examine the current knowledge of the role of trees in providing shelter for pastures, crops, and livestock, for controlling erosion of soils and improving productivity and sustainability of agricultural production in Australia — and the extent to which this knowledge has been applied.

Land degradation — tree loss and associated soil salinity, water and wind erosion, soil acidification, soil structural decline and nutrient degradation — is evidence that our primary production systems are not sustainable. We have sought increased production without proper consideration of the ecological context of that system. About half of Victoria's crop and pasture lands are affected or at risk, and in Western Australia about 25% of the cleared agricultural land is wind-eroded and 60% is potentially susceptible, salinity affects 0.43 m ha and half of the divertible surface water is affected by salinity. Similar problems occur in other States. At least 43 m ha or 13% of our rangelands are seriously degraded by wind erosion caused by overgrazing, often coinciding with drought or a run of drier years.

‘Minimum tillage’ and stubble management for erosion control in cropping has been a major extension and research activity in Australian agriculture. Severe weather, combined with imperfect adoption of appropriate grazing and crop management systems, shows the weakness of complete reliance on these methods of erosion control. An effective system must accommodate the impact of extreme events, which are the most damaging. However, the complementary use of windbreaks to reduce soil erosion is rare, and their establishment has not been promoted, despite the wide-spread adoption of this technology by other countries.

In the cropping and higher rainfall grazing areas, the systematic planting of 10% of the land in a net of shelterbelts/timberbelts/clusters could achieve a 50% windspeed reduction; this would substantially improve livestock and pasture production in the short and long-term. Wind erosion could be dramatically reduced and crop production probably increased by the use of windbreaks. Wheat and oat yield at Rutherglen (Victoria), and lupin yield at Esperance (Western Australia), were increased in the sheltered zone by 22% and 47%, and 30%, respectively.

In semi-arid and dry temperate areas, planting of 5% of the land to shelter could reduce windspeed by 30–50% and soil loss by up to 80%. This planting would also contribute substantially to achieving other objectives of sustainable agriculture. Agroforestry — particularly timberbelts applications — will be important in the long-term strategy for achieving revegetation. If some of the trees yield a marketable product then the adoption of the system will be more readily achieved.

In the arid (pastoral) areas there is an urgent need to promote the ethic that preservation and improvement of the perennial grass and shrub vegetation is critical for the protection of the soil and maintenance of land capability. Control of animal grazing remains the sole means of preventing erosion in much of this zone. While satellite imagery allows us to assess the condition of leasehold lands, we have failed to achieve stocking policies that will halt the degradation of our rangelands.

Key words

windbreak shelter wind erosion agroforestry trees sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson GW (1989) Agroforestry for Productivity. Proc third agroforestry conference, Morwell, Victoria. Victorian Agroforestry Extension CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagnold RA (1941) The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates CG (1911) Windbreaks: Their Influence and Value. US Dept of Agric, Forest Services Bulletin 86. Govt Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beckwith RS (1987) Low solubility phosphate fertilisers. Agric Sci 1: 18–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bicknell D (1991) The role of trees in providing shelter and controlling erosion in the dry temperate and semi-arid southern agricultural areas of Western Australia. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 21–39. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bird PR (1984) Effects of trees on agricultural productivity. In: Proc National Conf Focus on Farm Trees 2, pp 13–29. Univ of New England, Armidale, NSW, Canberra Publ & Printing Co, Fyshwick, ACTGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bird PR, Lynch JJ and Obst JM (1984) Effect of shelter on plant and animal production. Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 15: 270–273Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bird PR (1988) Timber production from shelterbelts. In: Proc seminar: Tree Growing on the Basalt Plains. Dept Cons, Forests & Lands/Rural Trees Aust, Streatham, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bird PR (1988) Financial gains of trees on farms through shelter. In: Proc International Forestry Conference for the Australian Bicentenary, Vol 2. Aust Forest Develop Institute, Albury-WodongaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bird R (1991) Tree and shelter effects on agricultural production in southern Australia. Agric Sci 4(5): 37–39Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bird PR (1991) The role of trees in protecting soils, plants and animals in Victoria. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 77–87. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bird PR and Cayley, JWD (1991) Bad weather, shelter and stock losses. Agric Sci 4(4): 18–19Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brandle JR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW (1988) Windbreak technology — Proc of International Symp at Lincoln, Nebraska. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bulman PA (1991) Shade, shelter and erosion control — a simplistic model to compare the relative benefits of different farm tree designs for South Australia. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 41–50. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burke S (1991) Effect of shelterbelts on crop yields at Rutherglen, Victoria. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 89–99. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjuction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and Microclimate. Forestry Commission Bull No 29, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Jones RM, Charles-Edwards DA and Barnes A (1989) Project STAG: an experimental study in agroforestry. Aust J Agric Res 40: 699–714Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell A (1991) Planning for Sustainable Farming — the Potter Farmland Plan story. Melbourne, Victoria, Publ Lothian Books, Greening AustGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campbell CA (1990) Planning. In: Cremer KW, ed, Trees for Rural Australia, pp 307–317. CSIRO, Inkata Press, Melbourne and SydneyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter DJ and Humphrey MG (1983) The costs of land degradation. Journal of Agriculture, Western Australia 24: 50–53Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chapman M (1990) Amenity. In: Cremer KW, ed, Trees for Rural Australia, pp 336–355. CSIRO, Inkata Press, Melbourne and SydneyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Commonwealth of Australia (1979) A Basis for Soil Conservation Policy in Australia. Report No. 1, Australian Govt Publ Service, Canberra, 193 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daly JJ (1984) Cattle need shade trees. Qld Agric J 110(1): 21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davidson RL and Briggs GM (1988) Farm Trees: A Practical Guide. Publ Focus on Farm Trees 2 Committee, Univ New England, Armidale, NSWGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donnelly JR (1984) The productivity of breeding ewes grazing on lucerne or grass and clover pastures on the tablelands of southern Australia. III Lamb mortality and weaning percentage. Aust J Agric Res 35: 709–721Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eckersly R (1989) Re-greening Australia: the environmental, economic and social benefit of reforestation. Occasional paper No. 3, CSIROGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ecos (1980) Vol 25. Soil Erosion: Can We Dam the Flood?Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farmtree — a Computer Model to Help Estimate the Profitability of Agroforestry (undated). Dept Agriculture/Dept of Conservation and Environment, Melbourne, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geiger R (1965) The Climate Near the Ground. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 507 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hagan LJ (1976) Windbreak design for optimum wind erosion control. In: Proceedings of the symposium: Shelterbelts on the Great Plains, pp 20–22. Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hagan LJ and Skidmore EL (1971) Turbulent velocity fluctuations and vertical flow as affected by windbreak porosity. Trans of the ASAE 14: 634–37Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall N, Boden RW, Christian CS, Condon RW, Dale FA, Hart AJ, Leigh JH, Marshall JK, McArthur AG, Russel V and Turnbull JW (1972) The use of trees and shrubs in the dry country of Australia. Aust Govt Publ Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Helyar K (1991) Soil acidity — causes, concerns and challenges. In: Proc seminar: Everlasting Plants and Soil — Is It Possible. Western District branch of Grassland Soc of Vic, Hamilton, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Houghton D (1984) Trees and erosion control. Qld Agric J 110(1): 9–12Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes KK (1984) Trees and salinity. Qld Agric J 110(1): 13–14Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Institute of Foresters of Australia (1989) Trees: Their Key Role in Rural Land Management. Submission to the House of Representatives Committee of Inquiry into Land Degradation in AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Irvin R (1991) Portugal's beleaguered Cork Oak. Ceres No. 127, 23(1): 37–42Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Knight M (1989) Preliminary shelterbelt wind-test results in mature random spaced open woodlands. In: Proc seminar: Land Care Futures, Melbourne. Landscape Architecture Unit, Royal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kort J and Brandle JR (1991) WBECON: a windbreak evaluation model. 1. A Comparison of windbreak characteristics. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 129–131. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kort J and Brandle JR (1991) WBECON: a windbreak evaluation model. 2. Economic returns from a windbreak investment in the Great Plains. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 131–134. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kulik KN (1991) Aerial and satellite methods of research in agrosilvicutural amelioration. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 55–59. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Leys J (1991) The role of trees in providing shelter to crops and controlling erosion. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 63–75. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lipsett J and Dann PR (1983) Wheat: Australia's hidden mineral export. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 49(2): 81–89Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Loveday J (1988) Australian soils — the last 200 years. In: Review Papers, National Soils Conference, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    MacLennan H (undated) Cultivation of arable land. Soil Conservation Authority, Soils Aid No 23. Govt Printer, Melbourne, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marsh B and Carter D (1983) Wind erosion. J Agric, WA 24(2): 54–57Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marshall CJ (1990) Control of erosion. In: Cremer, KW, ed, Trees for Rural Australia, pp 369–376. CSIRO, Inkata press, Melbourne and SydneyGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murray JS and Mitchell A (1962) Red gums and the nutrient balance. Proc Third Aust Conf Soil Science, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Parker JN (1991) The role of trees in shade, shelter and control of erosion in Tasmanian agriculture. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 101–107. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries andEnergy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pearson HA and Lewis CE (1989) Agroforestry in the South-Eastern United States, pp 1637–8. XVI International Grassland Congress Nice, FranceGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Reid R and Bird R (1990) Shade and shelter. In: Cremer KW, ed, Trees for Rural Australia, pp 319–335. CSIRO, Inkata Press, Melbourne and SydneyGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reid R and Wilson G (1985) Agroforestry in Australia and New Zealand. Publ Goddard and Dobson, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rural Research (1989) No 144. Wind erosion — dust, dunes, and tell-tale sediments, pp 13–23Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rural Research (1989) No 144. Tree clearing in the semi-arid tropics, pp 24–28Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Select Committee into Land Conservation (1990) Discussion paper No 2: Agricultural region of Western Australia. Legislative Assembly, Western Australian ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stepanov AM and Malanina ZI(1991) Shelterbelts in the USSR: an integral part of the agrolandscape. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 52–55. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sturrock JW (1969) Aerodynamic studies of shelterbelts in New Zealand. 1. Low to medium height shelterbelts in mid Canterbury. NZ J Sci 12: 754–76Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sturrock JW (1972) Aerodynamic studies of shelterbelts in New Zealand. 2. Medium height to tall shelterbelts in mid Canterbury. NZ J Sci 15: 113–40Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Song Zhaomin (1991) A review of the development of shelterbelt system in China. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 139–143. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    The Victorian draft Decade of Landcare plan — towards sustainable land use (1991) A discussion paper prepared for public comment by the Decade of landcare plan steering committee. Dept of Premier & Cabinet, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    USDA Forest Service (undated) The Center for Semiarid Agroforestry. Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Lincoln, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    van der Sommen FJ (1991) Amenity plantings in the Northern Territory. In: Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 51–54. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Voller P (1991) The role of trees in providing shelter and controlling erosion in Queensland. In:Proc of a national conference at Albury: The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, pp 55–61. Publ National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept Primary Industries and Energy, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Water Authority of Western Australia (1989) Stream Salinity and Its Reclamation — South-West Western Australia. Report No WS 52, Report of steering committee for research on land use and water supplyGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Western Australian Department of Agriculture and Water Authority of Western Australia (1988) Situation Statement: Soil and Land Conservation Programme in Western Australia. Submission to the House of Representatives Enquiry into Land DegradationGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Williams P (1989) In: Land and Water Research News No 4: 3–4Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Williams J (1991) Search for sustainability: agriculture and its place in the natural ecosystem. Agric Sci 4(2): 32–39Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wilson JR (1990) The eleventh hypothesis: shade. Agroforestry Today 2(1): 14–15Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wilson G, Kellas J and Kirby G (undated) Livestock Havens. Dept of Conservation and Environment/Dept of Agriculture, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wood O (1985) Crops, trees thrive at Rich Avon. Stock and Land 30 May, p 31Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Young A (1989) Ten hypotheses for soil agroforestry research. Agroforestry Today 1(1): 13–16Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Xiang Kai-fu (1991) Shelterbelt systems and agroforestry in northern China. In: Proc third international symposium: Windbreaks and Agroforestry, pp 9–12. Ridgetown College, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. R. Bird
    • 1
  • D. Bicknell
    • 2
  • P. A. Bulman
    • 3
  • S. J. A. Burke
    • 4
  • J. F. Leys
    • 5
  • J. N. Parker
    • 6
  • F. J. Van Der Sommen
    • 7
  • P. Voller
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Food and AgriculturePastoral and Veterinary InstituteHamiltonVictoria
  2. 2.Department of AgricultureEsperance Agricultural CentreEsperanceWestern Australia
  3. 3.Woods and Forests DepartmentAdelaideSouth Australia
  4. 4.Natural Resource Management Systems DivisionDepartment of Conservation and EnvironmentMelbourneVictoria
  5. 5.Department of Conservation and Land ManagementSoil Conservation ServiceBurongaNew South Wales
  6. 6.Private Forestry DivisionForestry CommissionKings MeadowsTasmania
  7. 7.Conservation CommissionPalmerstonNorthern Territory
  8. 8.Landcare and Forestry BranchQueensland Forestry Service, Extension Services SectionBrisbaneQueensland

Personalised recommendations