Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 5, Issue 8, pp 985–997 | Cite as

Helminth parasite richness among vertebrates

  • R. D. Gregory
  • A. E. Keymer
  • P. H. Harvey

The numbers of intestinal helminth species (parasite richnesS) recorded from each of 488 vertebrate host species are compared using data compiled from the published literature. Associations between parasite richness, sampling effort, host size and host habitat (aquatic versus terrestrial) are assessed using a method designed to control for phylogenetic association. Parasite richness increases with the number of surveys on which each estimate of parasite richness is based (sampling effort). When the effects of sampling effort are controlled for, there remains a strong positive relationship between parasite richness and host body size. There is no tendency for aquatic hosts to harbour more parasite species than terrestrial hosts independently of differences in sampling effort and body size. The results are interpreted in the context of hosts representing habitats for parasite colonization, resource allocation between parasite species, and the age of the major mammalian radiations.


Helminths vertebrates parasite richness sampling effort comparative method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adamson M.L. (1986) Modes of transmission and evolution of life histories in zooparasitic nematodes. Can. J. Zool. 62, 1375–84.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson R.C. (1984) The origins of zooparasitic nematodes. Can. J. Zool. 62, 317–28.Google Scholar
  3. Baker M.R. (1984) Nematode parasitism in amphibians and reptiles. Can. J. Zool. 62, 747–57.Google Scholar
  4. Begon M., Harper J.L. and Townsend C.R. (1990) Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bell G. and Burt A. (1991) The comparative biology of parasite species diversity: intestinal helminths of freshwater fishes. J. Animal Ecol. 60, 1047–63.Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn T.M., Harvey P.H. and Pagel M.D. (1990) Species number, population density and body size relationships in natural communities. J. Animal Ecol. 59, 335–45.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks D.R. (1980) Allopatric speciation and non-interactive parasite community structure. Syst. Zool. 29, 192–203.Google Scholar
  8. Brown J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Naturalist 124, 255–79.Google Scholar
  9. Brown J.H. and Maurer B.A. (1986) Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's Rule. Nature 324, 228–50.Google Scholar
  10. Brown J.H. and Maurer B.A. (1987) evolution of species assemblages: effects of energetic constraints and species dynamics on the diversification of the North American avifauna. Am. Naturalist 130, 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. Bush A.O., Aho J.M. and Kennedy C.R. (1990) Ecological versus phylogenetric determinants of helminth parasite community richness. Evol. Ecol. 4, 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Damuth J. (1981) Population density and body size in mammals. Nature 290, 699–700.Google Scholar
  13. Diamond J.M. and May R.M. (1981) Island biogeography and the design of natural reserves. In Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications (R.M. May, ed.) pp. 228–52. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Dogiel V.A. (1964) General Parasitology. Revised and enlarged by Yu I. Polyanski and E.M. Kheisin, 3rd edn. English translation. Edinburgh, London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  15. Esch G.W., Bush A.O. and Aho J.M. (1990) Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Felsenstein J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Naturalist 125, 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Garland T.Jr, Harvey P.H. and Ives A.R. (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32.Google Scholar
  18. Gaston K.J. and Lawton J.H. (1988a) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations. Nature 331, 709–12.Google Scholar
  19. Gaston K.J. and Lawton J.H. (1988b) Patterns in body size, population dynamics, and regional distribution of bracken herbivores. Am. naturalist 132, 662–80.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson D.I. (1981) Evolution of Digeneans. Workshop on Evolution of Helminths. IV. European Multicolloquium of Parasitology. Parasitology 82, 161–74.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson D.I. (1987) Questions in digenean systematics and evolution. Parasitology 95, 429–60.Google Scholar
  22. Grafen A. (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 326, 119–56.Google Scholar
  23. Gregory R.D. (1990) Parasites and host geographic range as illustrated by waterfowl. Func. Ecol. 4, 645–54.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory R.D., Keymer A.E. and Harvey P.H. (1991) Life history, ecology and parasite community structure in Soviet birds. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 43, 249–62.Google Scholar
  25. Hanski I. (1982) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38, 210–21.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey P.H. and Pagel M.D. (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Holmes J.C. and Price P.W. (1986) Communities of parasites. In Community Ecology: Patterns and Processes (D.J. Anderson and J. Kikkawa, eds) pp. 187–213. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Inglis W.G. (1965) Patterns of evolution in parasitic nematodes. In Evolution of Parasites, 3rd Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology (A.R.E. Taylor, ed.) pp. 79–124. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy C.R. and Bakke T.A. (1989) Diversity patterns in helminth communities in common gulls, Larus canus. Parasitology 98, 439–45.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy C.R., Bush A.O. and Aho J.M. (1986) Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–15.Google Scholar
  31. Kleiber M. (1961) The Fire of Life: an Introduction to Animal Energetics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Kuris A.M. and Blaustein A.R. (1977) Ectoparasitic mites on rodents: application of the island biogeography theory? Science 195, 596–8.Google Scholar
  33. Lawton J.H. (1989) What is the relationship between population density and body size in animals? Oikos 55, 429–34.Google Scholar
  34. Lawton J.H. (1990) Species richness and population dynamics of animal assemblages. Patterns in body size: abundance space. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 330 283–91.Google Scholar
  35. Llewellyn J. (1965) The evolution of parasitic platyhelminths. In Evolution of Parasites, 3rd Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology (A.R.E. Taylor, ed.) pp. 47–78. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Llewellyn J. (1986) Phylogenetic inference from Platyhelminth life-cycle stages. Internat. J. Parasitol. 17, 281–9.Google Scholar
  37. Martin R.D., Chivers D.J., MacLarnon A.M. and Hladik C.M. (1985) Gastrointestinal allometry in primates and other mammals. In Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (W.L. Jungers, ed.) pp. 61–89. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  38. May R.M. (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (M. Cody and J.M. Diamond, eds) pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Morse D.R., Stork N.E. and Lawton J.H. (1988) Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees. Ecol. Entomol. 13, 25–7.Google Scholar
  40. Pagel M.D., Harvey P.H. and Godray H.C.J. (1991) Species abundance, biomass, and resource-use distributions. Am Naturalist 138, 836–50.Google Scholar
  41. Price P.W. (1980) Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Monographs in Population Biology, 15. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Price P.W. (1990) Host populations as resources defining parasite community structure. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (G.W. Esch, A.O. Bush and J.M. Aho, eds) pp. 21–40. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Southwood T.R.E. (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J. Animal Ecol. 46, 337–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Gregory
    • 1
  • A. E. Keymer
    • 1
  • P. H. Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations