Abstract
We assess the validity of the Thisted-Efron author-ship tests in two stages. First, we construct simulated texts in accordance with the assumptions implicit in the underlying model and use these to validate the basic computations, to determine their range of applicability, and to evaluate their sensitivity to basic lexical parameters. Second, we experiment with actual texts from the Shakespearean canon and the plays of Christopher Marlowe. The results of the tests are mixed, showing good consistency for the Shakespeare plays (with some discrimination among early, middle and late works) but poor consistency between Shakespeare's poems and plays, or among Marlowe's plays.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Efron, B., and R. Thisted. “Estimating the Number of Unseen Species: How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know?” Biometrika, 63 (1976), 435–47.
Fisher, R., A. Corbett, and C. Williams. “The Relation between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population.” Journal of Animal Ecology, 12 (1943), 42–58.
Press, W., B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky, and W. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Thisted, R. Elements of Statistical Computing. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1988.
Thisted, R., and B. Efron. “Did Shakespeare Write a Newly-Discovered Poem?” Biometrika, 74 (1986), 445–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valenza, R.J. Are the Thisted-Efron authorship tests valid?. Comput Hum 25, 27–46 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054287
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054287