Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of genetic alterations associated with the process of human experimental colon cancer liver metastasis in the nude mouse

  • Research papers
  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Understanding the genetic elements controlling the process of tumor metastasis to distant organ sites such as the liver may be the key to improving survivorship from colon cancer. By using standard cytogenetic techniques in combination with comparative genomic hybridization, multiple genetic imbalances within three human colon cancer cell lines previously selected for differences in liver-metastatic behavior were identified. The entire genome of one poorly metastatic cell line (KM12C) was compared directly with that of two highly metastatic cell lines (KM12SM, KM12L4A) derived from it. A number of chromosomal gains (8q, 12g15, 20q11.2) and losses (5p13, 6p21.3, 18) were common to all three cell lines and are likely related to early tumor development rather than to the selection process used to generate cell lines of increased metastatic potential. Chromosomal imbalances detected only in the highly metastatic cell lines were also observed. KM12SM showed losses of portions of 2p22, 2824.3→2q32.2, 4p15.3→cen, 4q24 without the 13q and 15q22.3 gains noted for KM12C. Both gains (1p31.3→1p21, 2822→2q33, 3cen→3q26.2, 5q14→5q23, 6cen→6q23) and losses (16p, 17p, 17q, 19p, 19q, 22q) were observed for KM12L4A but not for the other two cell lines. Identification of these alterations provides valuable insight into the process of experimental liver metastasis and is a first step towards mapping genes linked to the terminal phases of human colon cancer progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires T, Tong T and Montgomery S, 1994, Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 44, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goyette MC, Cho K, Fasching CL et al, 1992, Progression of colorectal cancer is associated with multiple tumor suppressor gene defects but inhibition of tumorigenicity is accomplished by correction of any single defect via chromosome transfer. Molec Cell Biol, 12, 1387–95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeatman TJ and Nicolson GL, 1993, Molecular basis of tumor progression: mechanisms of organ-specific tumor metastasis. Semin Surg Oncol, 9, 256–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liotta LA, 1992, Cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Sci Am, 266, 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicolson GL, 1989, Metastatic tumor cell interactions with endothelium, basement membrane, and tissue. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1, 1009–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolson GL, Inoue T, Van Pelt C and Cavanaugh PG, 1990, Differential expression of a Mr 90,000 cell surface transferrin-related glycoprotein on murine B16 metastatic melanoma sublines selected for enhanced brain or ovary colonization. Cancer Res, 50, 515–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morikawa K, Walker S, Jessup JM and Fidler IJ, 1988, In vivo selection of highly metastatic cells from surgical specimens of different primary human colon carcinomas implanted into nude mice. Cancer Res, 48, 1943–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morikawa K, Walker S, Nakajima M, Pathak S, Jessupp JM and Fidler IJ, 1988, Influence of organ environment on the growth, selection, and metastasis of human colon carcinoma cells in nude mice. Cancer Res, 48, 6863–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Radinsky R, Risin S, Fan D et al, 1995, Level and function of epidermal growth factor receptor predict the metastatic potential of human colon carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res, 1, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O, Sudar D et al, 1992, Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science, 258, 5083.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanner MM, Tirkkonen M, Kallioniemi A et al, 1994, Increased copy number at 20g13 in breast cancer: defining the critical region and exclusion of candidate genes. Cancer Res, 54, 4257–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knapek DF, Serrano M, Beach D, Trono D and Walker CL, 1995, Association of rat p15INK4B/p15INK4 deletions with monosomy 5 in kidney epithelial cell lines but not primary renal tumors. Cancer Res, 55, 1607–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cher ML, MacGrogan D, Bookstein R, Brown JA, Jenkins RB and Jensen RH, 1994, Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancer. Genes Chromosom Cancer, 11, 153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bardi G, Johansson B, Pandis N et al, 1993, Cytogenetic aberrations in colorectal adenocarcinomas and their correlation with clinicopathologic features. Cancer 71, 306–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kern SE, Fearon ER and Tersmette KWF, 1989, Allelic loss in colorectal carcinoma. JAMA, 261, 3099–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Yeatman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeatman, T.J., Cher, M.L., Mao, W. et al. Identification of genetic alterations associated with the process of human experimental colon cancer liver metastasis in the nude mouse. Clin Exp Metast 14, 246–252 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053898

Keywords

Navigation