Skip to main content
Log in

On the expression of psychosis in different cultures: Schizophrenia in an indian and in a Nigerian community

A Report from the World Health Organization Project on Determinants of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorders

  • Published:
Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This sub-study of the WHO Determinants of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorders research project was aimed at characterizing the behavioral and expressive qualities of schizophrenia in two highly diverse cultures. Early research has indicated that the core elements involving affect, perceptual and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia are highly similar in form in most cultures of the world. Much of the cross-cultural literature emphasizes, however, strong differences in the ways in which schizophrenia is actually expressed and manifested in different settings. The basic methodology for psychiatric description and diagnosis in the WHO program was the Present State Examination. In five of the field centers a method for investigating the expressive quality and the social behavior of patients in their own communities through the eyes of significant others was applied. This method was then subjected to psychometric tests of cross-cultural applicability and found to be valid for comparing behavior across settings. The expressive patterns of the Indian and Nigerian patients were studied from two perspectives. Indian schizophrenics were described by family members as manifesting a more affective and “self-centered” orientation; the Nigerian patients presented with a highly suspicious, bizarre, anxious quality to the basic behavioral pattern. The main features of pathology were in general accord with the descriptions of indigenous psychiatrists. The special qualities of the psychosis in the two cultures were interpreted against the background of traditional psychopathological and anthropologic theories concerning the psychodynamics and the influence of differing social conflictual themes in the two cultures. Analysis of psychopathology in this manner was found to enhance understanding of underlying mechanisms and the role of cultural conflicts in its expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bharati, A. 1985 The Self in Hindu Thought and Action. In Marsella, A. et al. (eds.), Culture and Self: Western and Asian Perspectives. N.Y.: Tavistock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M. 1980 Adjustment and social behavior in the community, Psychology Department. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, unpublished manuscript.

  • Cement, C., Plutchik, R., Estrada, H., Gavira, L., and Arevalo, W. 1975A comparison of traditional and symptoms-checklist- based histories. American Journal of Psychiatry 132 Part 4:450–453.

  • Cooper, J. E., Kendell, R. E., Gurland, B. J., et al. 1972 Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London, (Maudsley Monograph Series No. 20). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. 1951 Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, T., Hogarty, G., and Ulrich, R. 1980 Interrater reliability of informants' ratings. Psychological Reports 47: 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draguns, J. 1973 Comparisons of Psychopathology across cultures: Issues, Findings, Directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 4 Part 1; 9–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, J., and Jaeckle, W. 1963 Psychiatric symptoms and diagnosis in two sub-cultures. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 9: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., and Geisser, S. 1959 On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honigman, J. J. 1967 Personality and Culture. N.Y.: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablensky, A., et al. Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Worldwide (in preparation).

  • Jung, C. J. 1923Psychological Types; or, The Psychology of Individuation (Translated by Helton Godwin Baynes). N.Y.: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R. L., Kapur, M., and Carstairs, G. M. 1974 Indian psychiatric interview schedule, (IPIS). Social Psychiatry 9: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. M., and Lyerly, S. B. 1963 Methods of measuring adjustment and social behavior in the community: I. Rationale, descriptions, discriminative validity and scale development. Psychological Reports 13: 503- 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. M., Sanborn, K. O., Lowery, H. A., and Ching, J. 1978 Ethnic Studies in Hawaii: On Psychopathology and Social Deviance. In The Nature of Schizophrenia: New Approaches to Research and Treatment. L. Wynne, R. Cromwell and S. Methysse (eds.), N.Y.: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H., Person, T. M., Cetingok, M., and Itil, T. M. 1978 Family and community variables in adjustment of Turkish and Missouri schizophrenics. Comprehensive Psychiatry 19 Part 3; 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambo, T. A. 1955 The role of cultural factors in paranoia psychosis among the Yoruba Tribe. Journal of Mental Science, CI, 239–255.

  • Lefkowitz, M. M. and Cannon, J. 1966 Physique and obstreperous behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology 22: 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, A. H., Lambo, T. A., Hughes, C. C., Leighton, D. C., Murphy, J. M., and Macklin, D. B. 1963 Psychiatric Disorder among the Yoruba. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorr, M., and Klett, C. J. 1968 Major Psychiatric disorders: A cross-cultural study. Archives of General Psychiatry 19: 652–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. M. 1976 Psychiatric labeling in cross-cultural perspective, Science 191: 1019–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius, N., Davidian, H., Ernberg, G., Fenton, F. R., Fujii, I., Gastpar, M., Gulbinat, W., Jablensky, A., Kielholz, P., Lehmann, H. E., Naraghi, M., Shimizu, M., Shinfuku, N., and Takahashi, R. 1983 Depressive Disorders in Different Cultures. Report on the WHO Collaborative Study on Standardized Assessment of Depressive Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius, N., Jablensky, A., Korten, A., Ernberg, G., Anker, M., Cooper, J. E., and Day, R. 1986 Early Manifestations and First Contact Incidence of Schizophrenia in Different Cultures. Psychological Medicine, 16: 909–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. 1947 Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: William Alanson White Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. R., Cooper, J. E., Sartorius, N. 1974 The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization 1973 The International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia, Vol. 1, Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO 1978 Mental Disorders: Glossary and Guide to Their Classification in Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Worldwide: A Report on the WHO Collaborative Study in Determinants of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization, (unpublished manuscript).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Address reprint requests to Dr. Martin M. Katz, Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, N.Y. 10461.

Note The research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grants R12 M31016, PO1 MH30322, U01 MH35883. 1 A factor limiting the sensitivity of such comparisons is that the patients were not randomly assigned to family member type. The ratings from the different types are therefore likely to be based on patient samples which may differ on certain demographic or clinical characteristics. This should work to reduce the amount of agreement that is otherwise possible when different family members are rating the same patient. 2 The approximate degrees of freedom for the number of behavioral factors is computed in accord with Greenhouse and Geisser (1959).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, M.M., Marsella, A., Dube, K.C. et al. On the expression of psychosis in different cultures: Schizophrenia in an indian and in a Nigerian community. Cult Med Psych 12, 331–355 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051973

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051973

Keywords

Navigation