Skip to main content

The Global Environment Facility and biodiversity conservation: lessons to date and suggestions for future action

The last five years in particular have seen increasing attention paid to biodiversity. This culminated at the Earth Summit last June with the completion of Agenda 21 and a major international Convention on Biological Diversity, a document signed by some 165 nations. Concurrent with the Convention negotiations was the development of a global fund for biodiversity conservation and other environmental priorities, the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The GEF is the largest fund to data put forward by the international community to address biodiversity loss, but, so far, it has failed to set adequate priorities for biodiversity conservation. It has also yet to recognize the full range of biodiversity values and uses and, in general, GEF projects have not taken advantage of existing non-governmental capacity for biodiversity conservation. 1993 is a critical year for the GEF, one in which the GEF can become a critical element of global efforts to conserve biodiversity or remain an important initialive that realized only a fraction of its potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ecotrust and Conservation International. (1992) Coastal Temperate Rain Forests: Ecological Characteristics, Status and Distribution Worldwide. Portland. OR: Ecotrust/Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. Ministry of Population and Environment and World Bank. (1991) Biodiversity action plan for Indonesia Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Environment Facitily. (1992) Report by the Chairman to the December 1992 Participants Meeting, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, C., Carr, J. and Tangley, L. (1992) Biodiversity at Risk: a Preview of Conservation International's Atlas for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. and Cabarle, B. (1993) Surviving the Cut: Natural Forest Management in the Humid Tropics. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, K. (1991) Policies for Maximizing Nature Tourism's Ecological and Economic Benefits. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. and Tangley, L. (1991) Trees of Life: Saving Tropical Forests and their Biological Wealth. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity (E.O., Wilson, ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A., Malone, S., Plotkin, M., Baal, F., Mohadin, K., MacKnight, J., Werkhoven, M. and Werner, T.B. (1990) Conservation Action Plan for Suriname. Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. and Werner, T.B. (1990) Wealth of plants and animals unites megadiversity countries. Tropicus 4, 1. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. (1988) Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. Switzerland: IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, M.V., Mittermeier, R.A. and Werner, T.B. (1990). Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. Washington, DC and Gland, Switzerland: WWF-US and Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1979) The sinking ark: a new look at the problem of disappearing species Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1983) A Wealth of Wild Species. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1984) The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1988) Threatened biotas: hot-spots in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8, 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. The Environmentalist 10, 243–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T.A.III and Bailey, B., eds (1991) A biological assessment of the Alto Madidi region and adjacent areas of Northwest Bolivia. RAP Working Papers 1. Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T.A.III and Carr, J. eds (1992) Status of forest remnants in the Cordillera de la Costa and adjacent areas of Southwestern Ecuador. RAP Working Papers 2. Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P.H. (1980) Research Priorities in Tropical Biology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangley, L. (1992) Mapping biodiversity: computers and conservation priorities. Lessons from the Field 1. Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (ed.) (1988) Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1992) The Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (1992) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. Cambridge, UK: WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI (1989) Natural Endowments: Financing Resource Conservation for Development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI, IUCN, UNEP. (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy: Guidelines for Action to Save, Study and use the Earth's Biotic Wealth Sustainably and Equitably, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittermeier, R.A., Bowles, I.A. The Global Environment Facility and biodiversity conservation: lessons to date and suggestions for future action. Biodivers Conserv 2, 637–655 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051964

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051964

Keywords

  • Global Environment Facility (GEF)
  • biodiversity values
  • incremental costs